2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-010-9348-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of CH3, F and NO2 substituents on the individual hydrogen bond energies in the adenine–thymine and guanine–cytosine base pairs

Abstract: The substituent effects on the geometrical parameters and the individual hydrogen bond (HB) energies of base pairs such as X-adenine-thymine (X-A-T), X-thymine-adenine (X-T-A), X-guanine-cytosine (X-G-C), and X-cytosine-guanine (X-C-G) have been studied by the quantum mechanical calculations at the B3LYP and MP2 levels with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. The electron withdrawing (EW) substituents (F and NO(2)) increase the total binding energy (DeltaE) of X-G-C derivatives and the electron donating (ED) substitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrogen bonds are due to electrostatic interactions with significant contributions of charge‐transfer and polarization effects 28–30. Methyl groups are electron donors, which can both strengthen or weaken hydrogen bonding between nucleobases, depending on the specific hydrogen‐bond configuration 31–33. Furthermore, the polarizability of a molecule is increased when a methyl group is present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen bonds are due to electrostatic interactions with significant contributions of charge‐transfer and polarization effects 28–30. Methyl groups are electron donors, which can both strengthen or weaken hydrogen bonding between nucleobases, depending on the specific hydrogen‐bond configuration 31–33. Furthermore, the polarizability of a molecule is increased when a methyl group is present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A-T versus G-C. The energy of an individual H-bond has been evaluated by several approaches: (1) in the (presumed) absence of other intermolecular interactions as a bonding energy of the H-bonded complex [2]; (2) through calculations of inter-residue compliance constants for all possible X-HÁÁÁY contacts [3]; (3) by application of an atom replacement procedure [4]; (4) using the ELM (Espinosa, Lecomte, Molins) equation [5] to estimate of the individual OÁÁÁH energy, whereas NÁÁÁH ones obtained from the difference in the total binding energy between the two monomers and the energies of the remaining OÁÁÁH interactions [6] (5) utilizing the obtained relationship between the dissociation energy of the individual intermolecular interactions and the electron density at the H-bond critical point, obtained for symmetrical complexes with two identical N-HÁÁÁO H-bonds [7,8]; (6) an application of the Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) concept to intermolecular interactions [9]. All these methods were described in more detail as well as their results compared in our previous paper [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second one, the individual HB energies (∆E HB ) were estimated using the electron densities (ρ) calculated using the AIM method at the H-bond critical points (HBCPs) on the basis of the following equation [51][52][53].…”
Section: Computational Details and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%