The Effect of Caffeine Ingestion on Field Hockey Skill Performance Following Physical Fatigue

Duncan, Michael; Taylor, Samantha; Lyons, Mark

doi:10.1080/15438627.2012.634686

Cited by 24 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Subjects were asked to rate how physically and mentally ready they were to invest effort using visual scales ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting greater readiness to invest effort, as described. 33 Resting and HRpeak was assessed using telemetry (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland). Data from our laboratory indicate two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC R's) of 0.839 for repetitions, 0.994 for total weight lifted, 0.861 for OMINI-RES RPE, 0.947 for RTIPE, 0.844 for RTIME and 0.774 for HRpeak in bench press exercise.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of exercise intensity on perceived exertionduring multiple sets of bench press to volitional failure

Silva¹,

Azevedo²,

Cordeiro³

et al. 2014

Journal of Trainology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of intensity on rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during multiple sets to volitional failure in bench press exercise. Design and Methods: Thirteen moderately resistance trained men performed 2 experimental sessions in random order: 3 sets to failure in bench press with 1 minute rest at an intensity of 50% and 70% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). RPE was measured using the OMNI scale after each set. Readiness to Invest in Physical (RTIPE) and Mental (RTIME) Effort were assessed before each set. Results: Repetitions to failure (46.46 ± 9.43 vs 26.62 ± 8.19; P<0.001) and total weight lifted (2044.31 ± 414.5 vs 1650.15 ± 507.83 kg; P<0.001) were greater at 50% when compared to the 70% 1RM condition. There were no differences in RPE, RTIPE, RTIME and heart rate across conditions. Conclusions: These results indicate that when repetitions are done to volitional failure, monitoring RPE is not a useful technique in regulating intensity during resistance training.(Journal of Trainology 2014;3:41-46)

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of exercise intensity on perceived exertionduring multiple sets of bench press to volitional failure

Silva¹,

Azevedo²,

Cordeiro³

et al. 2014

Journal of Trainology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Performance tests serve a variety of purposes in exercise and sport scenarios, including assessing the effectiveness of researcher- or practitioner-implemented interventions [5–7] or monitoring participant progress within a prescribed exercise programme [3, 8]. These tests can also be used to gather objective evidence of a participant’s strengths and weaknesses [9, 10] or provide diagnostic information relating to the health (e.g., injury) status of an individual [3, 11, 12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundPerformance tests are used for multiple purposes in exercise and sport science. Ensuring that a test displays an appropriate level of measurement properties for use within a population is important to ensure confidence in test findings.The aim of this study was to obtain subject matter expert consensus on the measurement and feasibility properties that should be considered for performance tests used in the exercise and sport sciences and how these should be defined. This information was used to develop a checklist for broader dissemination.MethodsA two-round Delphi study was undertaken including 33 exercise scientists, academics and sport scientists. Participants were asked to rate the importance of a range of measurement properties relevant to performance tests in exercise and sport science. Responses were obtained in binary and Likert-scale formats, with consensus defined as achieving 67% agreement on each question.ResultsConsensus was reached on definitions and terminology for all items. Ten level 1 items (those that achieved consensus on all four questions) and nine level 2 items (those achieving consensus on ≥2 questions) were included. Both levels were included in the final checklist.ConclusionsThe checklist developed from this study can be used to inform decision-making and test selection for practitioners and researchers in the exercise and sport sciences. This can facilitate knowledge sharing and performance comparisons across sub-disciplines, thereby improving existing field practice and research methodological quality.

show abstract

“…Tests of skill outcomes experience widespread utility in research, in particular for the purpose of assessing the effect of coaching or scientific interventions on performance. [8][9][10] Recent studies have also utilised these tests to investigate the effects of nutrition, [11][12][13][14] game-specific fatigue, [15] performer focus of attention [16] and pre-skill execution routine [17] on participant performance. Further, a body of work exists in team-based field sports such as football in assessing participant skill (amongst other factors) within simulated match-play environments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tests Examining Skill Outcomes in Sport: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties and Feasibility

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A high level of participant skill is influential in determining the outcome of many sports. Thus, tests assessing skill outcomes in sport are commonly used by coaches and researchers to estimate an athlete's ability level, evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or for the purpose of talent identification.Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to examine the methodological quality, measurement properties and feasibility characteristics of sporting skill outcome tests reported in the peer-reviewed literature.Data Sources: A search of both SPORTDiscus and MEDLINE databases was undertaken.Study Selection: Studies that examined tests of sporting skill outcomes were reviewed. Only studies that investigated measurement properties of the test (reliability or validity) were included. A total of 22 studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods:A customised checklist of assessment criteria, based on previous research, was utilised for the purpose of this review.Results: A range of sports were the subject of the 22 studies included in this review, with considerations relating to methodological quality being generally well-addressed by authors.A range of methods and statistical procedures were used by researchers to determine the measurement properties of their skill outcome tests. The majority (95%) of the reviewed studies investigated test-retest reliability, and where relevant, inter and intra-rater reliability was also determined. Content validity was examined in 68% of the studies, with most tests investigating multiple skill domains relevant to the sport. Only 18% of studies assessed all three reviewed forms of validity (content, construct and criterion) with just 14% investigating iii Tests examining skill outcomes in sport the predictive validity of the test. Test responsiveness was reported in only 9% of studies, whilst feasibility received varying levels of attention. Limitations:In organised sport, further tests may exist which have not been investigated in this review. This could be due to such tests firstly, not being published in the peer-review literature and secondly, not having their measurement properties (i.e. reliability or validity) examined formally. Conclusions:Of the 22 studies included in this review, items relating to test methodological quality were on the whole, well addressed. Test-retest reliability was determined in all but one of the reviewed studies, whilst most studies investigated at least two aspects of validity (i.e. content, construct or criterion-related validity). Few studies examined predictive validity or responsiveness. While feasibility was addressed in over half of the studies, practicality and test limitations were rarely addressed. Consideration of study quality, measurement properties and feasibility components assessed in this review can assist future researchers when developing or modifying tests of sporting skill outcomes.

show abstract

The Effect of Caffeine Ingestion on Field Hockey Skill Performance Following Physical Fatigue

Cited by 24 publications

References 31 publications

Effects of exercise intensity on perceived exertionduring multiple sets of bench press to volitional failure

Effects of exercise intensity on perceived exertionduring multiple sets of bench press to volitional failure

Consensus on measurement properties and feasibility of performance tests for the exercise and sport sciences: a Delphi study

Tests Examining Skill Outcomes in Sport: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties and Feasibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About