2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/160129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Bulk Density on Emission Behavior of Soil at Microwave Frequencies

Abstract: Dielectric constant and dielectric loss (ε′ and ε″) of different soil samples with bulk densities varying from 1.3 to 2.0 gm/cm3 are determined at a single microwave frequency 9.78 GHz and at temperature 37.0°C. Different bulk densities of same soil are achieved by filling the wave guide cell with an equal volume but a different mass of soil. Further, ε′ and ε″ of these soil samples are also estimated by semiempirical model and compared with the experimental results. The values of ε′ and ε″ increase as bulk d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To extend the applicability of the derived dielectric properties to frequencies between 10 and 89 GHz, a simple parameterization of the imaginary part of the permittivity is proposed. ϵν ${{\epsilon}}_{\nu }^{{\prime\prime}}$ has been described as an inverse function of the frequency for dry rocks (Ulaby et al., 1990), or with a Debye‐type model dependent on multiple parameters such as the sand fraction (Dobson et al., 1985; Gupta & Jangid, 2011; Peplinski et al., 1995), and soil moisture contents above 5%. For very dry soil, we suggest an empirical approach, only retaining the inverse relationship of ϵν ${{\epsilon}}_{\nu }^{{\prime\prime}}$ with frequency: ϵν=a+bν, ${{\epsilon}}_{\nu }^{{\prime\prime}}=a+\frac{b}{\nu },$ with a and b coefficients to represent the spatial variation of the dielectric properties.…”
Section: Discussion and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the applicability of the derived dielectric properties to frequencies between 10 and 89 GHz, a simple parameterization of the imaginary part of the permittivity is proposed. ϵν ${{\epsilon}}_{\nu }^{{\prime\prime}}$ has been described as an inverse function of the frequency for dry rocks (Ulaby et al., 1990), or with a Debye‐type model dependent on multiple parameters such as the sand fraction (Dobson et al., 1985; Gupta & Jangid, 2011; Peplinski et al., 1995), and soil moisture contents above 5%. For very dry soil, we suggest an empirical approach, only retaining the inverse relationship of ϵν ${{\epsilon}}_{\nu }^{{\prime\prime}}$ with frequency: ϵν=a+bν, ${{\epsilon}}_{\nu }^{{\prime\prime}}=a+\frac{b}{\nu },$ with a and b coefficients to represent the spatial variation of the dielectric properties.…”
Section: Discussion and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vigorous soil needs air, water, and pore space for proficient root penetration and plant growth. If soil is compact or bulk density is too high, then plant roots will not propagate well, and hence yield will be reduced ( Gupta and Jangid, 2011 ). Thus, information on bulk density will assist in soil management and in future planning to enhance soil fertility by technological means ( Chaudhari et al., 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, models of SD permittivity exist reflecting certain physical and structural properties (e.g., [11,15]). Most of these models only took bulk permittivity into consideration [28]. However, recent studies by [9] introduced scaled permittivity.…”
Section: Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique however does not work well for low loss materials. [28,39] considered many of the reported dielectric constant values as inaccurate apparently due to the measurement techniques and the way the samples were collected and prepared. The work attempted to compile (from the literature) values believed to be the most accurate and reasonable.…”
Section: Permittivitymentioning
confidence: 99%