2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of “breathable” panty liners on the female lower genital tract

Abstract: After 75 days of BPL use, there was no significant increase in vulvovaginal candidiasis, bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal irritation, or vulvovaginal inflammation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Jancovic et al (18) found a higher incidence of VC in women who were used to wear underwear with cotton lining between menstrual cycles in comparison to those no wearing them (p=0.0001). However, Giraldo et al (20) did not find significant difference as to the presence of candidiasis or bacterial vaginitis in women using breathable sanitary pads for 75 consecutive days in comparison to the Control Group, composed of women using only cotton underwear in the same period, which suggests that breathable sanitary pads are safe to women's health. It is noteworthy that 59.3% of women chose to wear cotton underwear daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Jancovic et al (18) found a higher incidence of VC in women who were used to wear underwear with cotton lining between menstrual cycles in comparison to those no wearing them (p=0.0001). However, Giraldo et al (20) did not find significant difference as to the presence of candidiasis or bacterial vaginitis in women using breathable sanitary pads for 75 consecutive days in comparison to the Control Group, composed of women using only cotton underwear in the same period, which suggests that breathable sanitary pads are safe to women's health. It is noteworthy that 59.3% of women chose to wear cotton underwear daily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In a prospective study [12] performed in Brazil, Giraldo et al randomly divided 107 healthy participants who were not overweight and were without gynecologic complaints into two groups. The study group (n = 53) was instructed to use breathable panty liners for 10–12 hours daily for 75 days, and the control group (n = 54) was asked to use their usual undergarments only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farage et al [15] observed no changes in microflora following daily panty liner use for 6 months when examining vaginal secretions and cultures taken from used sanitary pads. Giraldo et al [12] found no increase in the occurrence of bacterial vaginosis, candidiasis, or vulvovaginal irritation in healthy women who were not overweight after the use of breathable daily panty liners for 75 days. Breathable (vapor‐permeable) products were used in this study to minimize the effect of extended skin coverage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As mulheres que apresentam aumento na umidade vaginal (obesas, com atividade física intensa, excesso de lubrificação íntima, grande transpiração) poderiam se beneficiar do uso dos absorventes intermenstruais com camada inferior respirável, uma vez que este estudo sugere não haver alterações clínicas significativas (hiperemia, ardor e prurido), e com manifesta satisfação do uso regular durante o período intermenstrual. Conforme sugere um estudo complementar 15 , além de propiciar satisfação de uso e conferir segurança higiênica, o uso dos absorventes respiráveis não provoca modificações substanciais da flora vulvar e vaginal.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified