2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-016-9873-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of branching angle on adaptive growth in patchy environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effect was weak in general. The only exception occurred at extremely high ramet mortality ( d i and d t > 0.8), when the ramet density behind the spreading front was low, and thus, immediate backtracking became feasible (Benedek et al 2016). In this recent study, we did not use these extremely high ramet mortality values, as for these, the proportion of quasi-steady-state cases was zero in the homogeneous environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the effect was weak in general. The only exception occurred at extremely high ramet mortality ( d i and d t > 0.8), when the ramet density behind the spreading front was low, and thus, immediate backtracking became feasible (Benedek et al 2016). In this recent study, we did not use these extremely high ramet mortality values, as for these, the proportion of quasi-steady-state cases was zero in the homogeneous environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the effects of ramet mortality on clonal plant growth using some of these parameter combinations too, and we found that our results are valid in a considerable range of the parameter space (data not shown). Our further studies tested clonal plant growth also in a heterogeneous environment (Benedek et al 2016; Oborny et al 2017), and we varied the scale of habitat patchiness compared to the scale of growth (Oborny et al 2017). However, without field studies, these do not yet provide a full picture of environmental controls and growth rules internal to the plant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasticity of stolon and rhizome internode (hereafter also referred to as "internodes" for brevity) length allows clonal plants to have a higher opportunity to encounter resource-rich patches, and consequently a greater ability to adapt to heterogeneous environments (de Kroon and Hutchings 1995;Gao et al 2012;Roiloa et al 2014;van Kleunen and Fischer 2001;Xue et al 2018c;Ye et al 2006). In general, clonal plants would produce shorter internodes to utilize adequate resources in favorable habitats, while longer ones can help to "escape" from unfavorable patches (Benedek et al 2017;de Kroon and Schieving 1990;Dong 1993;Si et al 2020;Oborny and Cain 1997;Ye et al 2006). This morphological response in clonal plants has been extensively linked to external environmental factors such as nutrient, water and light availabilities (Dong 1993;Hagiwara et al 2010;Wijesinghe et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%