The Effect of Blood Pressure on the Risk of Developing Systemic Diseases

Delmanova, Sabina; Gasanova, Diana; Gunov, Stanislav; Kovaleva, A.N.; Tatarinov, Vadim

doi:10.5455/jcmr.2022.13.02.13

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and premature death, 1,2 accounting for approximately 45% of CVD‐associated morbidity and mortality globally 3 . The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that 18 million people died from CVDs worldwide, representing 31% of the total deaths 1 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between mouth rinse use and changes in blood pressure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

Farook,

Alnasyan,

Alhamid

et al. 2023

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionPrevious randomized controlled trials have shown that the use of antiseptic mouth rinses not only eradicates oral bacteria but also disrupts their ability to convert nitrate to nitrite, which is the key molecule in regulating blood pressure (BP).ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the association between the use of mouth rinses and changes in BP.MethodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from their respective inception dates to 18th December 2022 to identify potential interventional studies with information on the association between the use of mouth rinse and changes in BP. Five trials using a controlled, crossover design were identified for data analysis.ResultsThe weighted mean difference was pooled using a random‐effects model. The pooled results of five trials together showed that the use of mouth rinses did not result in a statistically or clinically significant increase in the systolic BP (SBP) (1.59 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.15 to 3.33) or diastolic BP (DBP) (0.46 mmHg; 95% CI, −0.72 to 1.64). The trial sequential analysis did not present conclusive evidence supporting the association between mouth rinse use and BP elevation.ConclusionWithin the limits of the available evidence, our review and meta‐analysis showed that mouth rinse use did not result in a statistically significant increase in the SBP, DBP, or mean arterial pressure (MAP). Nevertheless, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the high degree of inconsistency across the studies.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between mouth rinse use and changes in blood pressure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

Farook,

Alnasyan,

Alhamid

et al. 2023

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In China, the prevalence of hypertension and prehypertension among residents aged 18 years or older was 23.2% (≈ 244.5 million) and 41.3% (≈ 435.3 million), respectively, from 2012 to 2015. [1,2] With increasing age and disease duration, patients with hypertension develop various complications, such as stroke and coronary heart disease, affecting this population's quality of life and disease control. [3,4] Consequently, aggressive early intervention is required to control the rise in blood pressure (BP).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Shen

et al. 2022

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension to explore more suitable training. Methods: PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2002 and November 2022. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were selected as the effect scale indices for the evaluation of the differences in post-intervention systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), and flow-mediated vasodilation. All these were compared using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Results: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials and 442 patients were included. The meta-analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between HIIT and MICT in improving SBP and DBP in patients with hypertension. Subgroup analyses revealed that HIIT was better than MICT in reducing SBP during daytime monitoring (WMD = −4.14, 95%CI: [−6.98, −1.30], P < .001). In addition, HIIT increased flow-mediated vasodilation more than MICT in hypertensive patients (WMD = 2.75, 95%CI: [0.43, 5.07], P = .02). Conclusion: HIIT and MICT have similar effects on the overall resting SBP and DBP in patients with hypertension and prehypertension. However, HIIT is better than MICT at reducing SBP during daytime monitoring. In addition, HIIT can improve vasodilation.

show abstract

The Effect of Blood Pressure on the Risk of Developing Systemic Diseases

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Association between mouth rinse use and changes in blood pressure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

Association between mouth rinse use and changes in blood pressure: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with trial sequential analysis

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About