2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Biologically Effective Dose and Radiation Treatment Schedule on Overall Survival in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients receiving high‐dose treatment (BED ≥ 100 Gy 10 ) had better OS than those receiving low‐dose treatment (BED < 100 Gy 10 ). A similar effect has been reported in early‐stage NSCLC treated by SBRT, which support our findings. However, in this cohort, if we redefined the OS from the disease diagnosis to death, the 5‐years OS was 67.3%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients receiving high‐dose treatment (BED ≥ 100 Gy 10 ) had better OS than those receiving low‐dose treatment (BED < 100 Gy 10 ). A similar effect has been reported in early‐stage NSCLC treated by SBRT, which support our findings. However, in this cohort, if we redefined the OS from the disease diagnosis to death, the 5‐years OS was 67.3%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients receiving high-dose treatment (BED ≥ 100 Gy 10 ) had better OS than those receiving lowdose treatment (BED < 100 Gy 10 ). A similar effect has been reported in early-stage NSCLC treated by SBRT, [32][33][34] A recent study suggests that further elevation in the BED to 130 Gy 10 may provide even better LC of liver oligometastases in CRC patients. 35 Compared with the patients in that study, our patients had more extensive metastatic disease and a larger number of lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We are taking steps to seek external databases for additional validation and look forward to reporting the results of external validation in a subsequent study, which would also provide a larger sample size and may thus potentially elucidate an association between RR-and TTP-related predictors. Second, because the median BED 10 of the prescription doses in our study is 112.5 Gy (which falls into the optimal dose range for tumor control according to previous reports 39,42,43 ), the applicability of our models in patients treated with lower BED 10 (<112.5 Gy) still requires validation. Additionally, caution should be exercised before applying these nomogram models in the setting of particularly large tumors (>5 cm) given the limited number of such patients (n Z 7) within our study population and patients with ultracentral lesions (because ultracentral lesions are not treated with SABR per our institutional standard of care).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…(1)] does not consider tumor volume. A recent study also mentioned the escalation of BED to high levels (>150 Gy) would be required for patients with a tumor size >3 cm in lung SBRT. Modification of the linear quadratic model and dose escalation for patients with larger tumor volume were necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biologically equivalent dose (BED) has been introduced into optimal doses and fractionation schedules of SBRT . BED 10 , BED calculated using α / β of 10 Gy in the linear quadratic model, is used to predict of local control in lung SBRT.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%