2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of backpack weight on the standing posture and balance of schoolgirls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and normal controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
50
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger computed AI variability may be a cue of such a progressive behaviour. These results observed in two orthogonal planes are confirmed by previous studies of gait and standing postures [12,17]. Ontogenic development of spinal deformity associated with the morphotype of SG and with the consequences of biomechanical aspect [1] may explain the variability of dynamic motor strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Larger computed AI variability may be a cue of such a progressive behaviour. These results observed in two orthogonal planes are confirmed by previous studies of gait and standing postures [12,17]. Ontogenic development of spinal deformity associated with the morphotype of SG and with the consequences of biomechanical aspect [1] may explain the variability of dynamic motor strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Each subject randomly performed five trials per variable (the order of trials was randomized). The sampling frequency of both force-plates was 100 Hz, which is consistent with the literature [2,12]. The dependent variables were Fx, Fy and Fz.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Chow et al [12][13][14] in a series of studies, progressively evaluated backpack loads of 0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 and 15.0 % of BW in a healthy and scoliotic population Table 1 Means and SDs for the four force curve parameters examined (peak ground reaction force F1 at the first maximum force peak, time T1 needed to reach this force peak, loading rate LRF1 and total contact time T2), for all walking conditions, of both the scoliotic and healthy children Eur Spine J (2012) 21:1936-1941 1939 with mild AIS. They demonstrated a reduction of walking speed and cadence, an increased anterior flexion of the trunk on the pelvis and antero-posterior balance difficulty both in healthy and scoliotic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions involved unload condition with eyes open (EO), the asymmetrical loading of the shoulder (left shoulder-LS vs. right shoulder-RS) and the pelvis (right pelvis-RP vs. left pelvis-LP). The load added, which corresponded to 15% of the weight of the body segment in question [12], was that found to increase the inertia of the trunk segment in walking for AIS subjects. Vernazza et al [35] have suggested that this increase in the segmental inertia may be due to a combination between age and parameters such as the body weight, the segment masses and the segment length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%