2020
DOI: 10.1080/1064119x.2020.1736699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of backfilling stiffness on lateral response of the shallowly trenched-backfilled pipelines in clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moradi and Abbasnejad used a modified Mohr–Coulomb model to study the arching effect over a trapdoor in sand [ 35 ]. Through the study of backfill stiffness and pipe-soil interaction, Morteza and Hodjat revealed the influence of different backfill stiffness on pipe-soil interaction and pipe failure model [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moradi and Abbasnejad used a modified Mohr–Coulomb model to study the arching effect over a trapdoor in sand [ 35 ]. Through the study of backfill stiffness and pipe-soil interaction, Morteza and Hodjat revealed the influence of different backfill stiffness on pipe-soil interaction and pipe failure model [ 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various large deformation numerical methods have been developed and used to explore pipe-soil interaction, based on traditional finite element methods or the recently developed meshfree/particle methods. The former category includes the Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) approach [26,27], the sequential limit analysis (SLA) approach [28][29][30], and the Remeshing and Interpolation Technique with Small Strain (RITSS) method [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] which falls in the category of Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) approach [39,40]. Wang et al [26] compared the performance of CEL, RITSS, and an efficient ALE (EALE) approach, concluding that for quasi-static problems with contact interfaces, the CEL model required smaller elements, so greater number of degrees of freedom, to achieve comparable accuracy of Lagrangian-based approaches (i.e., RITSS and EALE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%