2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of backfat thickness at mating on the reproductive and productive performances of ewes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies confirmed significant differences of growth performance in depending on breed (Milerski et al, 2006;Maxa et al, 2007), ewe's live weight at mating (Abdel-Mageed and El-Maaty, 2012;Aliyari et al, 2012;Vatankhah et al, 2012), litter size (Kuchtík and Dobeš, 2006;Cloete et al, 2007), sex of lambs (Mohammadi et al, 2010, Ptáček et al, 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Previous studies confirmed significant differences of growth performance in depending on breed (Milerski et al, 2006;Maxa et al, 2007), ewe's live weight at mating (Abdel-Mageed and El-Maaty, 2012;Aliyari et al, 2012;Vatankhah et al, 2012), litter size (Kuchtík and Dobeš, 2006;Cloete et al, 2007), sex of lambs (Mohammadi et al, 2010, Ptáček et al, 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Rahmani ewes had higher ( p < .05) litter size (1.16 ± 0.03 vs. 1.01 ± 0.01) and percentage of twin births (18.38% vs. 1.98%) compared with Barki ewes. Rahmani ewes were reported to have higher ovulation rate, 1.29–1.57 vs. 1.16–1.20 (Abdel‐Mageed & Abo El‐Maaty, ) and litter size, 1.12–1.48 vs. 1.00–1.16 (Aboul‐Naga, Aboul‐Ela, & Hassan, ) than Barki ewes. Hashem, El‐Zarkouny, Taha, and Abo‐Elezz () also found that the average rate of twin births and the litter size reached 20.28% and 1.20, respectively, in Barki × Rahmani cross‐bred ewes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El espesor de grasa al momento del empadre no afecta la tasa de parición y el tamaño de camada; sin embargo, incrementa el peso de la camada al nacer y al destete (21); por lo que, además de considerar la importancia de la recuperación de la oveja al empadre en los parámetros reproductivos, es necesario valorar los beneficios en el desarrollo futuro de los corderos. Se han encontrado mejores parámetros productivos y reproductivos en ovejas con grasa corporal de 1.5 a 2 mm y las de más de 2 mm comparadas con aquellas con un espesor menor a 1.5 mm (22). En el presente estudio no hubiera sido posible hacer una clasificación de espesor de grasa tan baja al momento del empadre, ya que sólo el 8.6% de ovejas tuvieron un espesor menor a 2 mm, concentrándose el 69.5% entre 2 y 3 mm de grasa.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified