The effect of auditor type on audit quality in emerging markets: evidence from Egypt

Abstract

Purpose Although a number of studies suggest that big audit firms provide higher audit quality in strict legal environments, empirical evidence remains inconclusive. As little is known about the effect of auditor type on audit quality in less strictly legal environments, this study aims to investigate the impact of auditor type on audit quality in the Egyptian market. Design/methodology/approach Data of Egyptian-listed companies during the period 2011–2018 are used. To examine the impact of auditor type on audit quality, ordinary least square regression and robust standard errors clustered at year and industry level are used. This study uses discretionary accruals as a proxy for audit quality. Several additional analyzes are conducted to assess the robustness of the main results, including alternative measures of audit quality and auditor type. Findings The results show that audit firms tend to provide higher audit quality when they are affiliated with a foreign audit firm. However, Big 4 auditors do not provide higher audit quality compare to their counterparts. Additionally, the governmental agency, accountability state authority, that monopolize audit function in state-owned companies do not appear to be associated with higher audit quality. Finally, local audit firms have a negative association with audit quality. This may be their strategy to secure future clients that seek low-quality audits. Research limitations/implications This study suggests that affiliation with foreign audit firms will help the Egyptian firms to develop their abilities by using advanced technology and techniques and transfer rare expertize to the Egyptian auditors. This study also shows that the strategy adopted by many Egyptian audit firms to affiliate with foreign auditors reflects the desire of these firms to be included in one tier alongside Big 4 audit firms to increase their market share under a claim of providing a higher audit quality. Originality/value This study adds to the rare but growing body of literature by investigating how auditor type affects audit quality in the context of less strictly legal environments. The results are important, as investors, standards-setters and regulators have growing concerns over audit quality since the Enron scandal. The findings suggest that audit quality depends on auditor type. These findings have important implications for investors, standards-setters and auditors interested in auditor oversight, audit quality and auditor choice.

Big N auditors and the quality of earnings: Evidence from Middle Eastern and North African countries

“…In contrast to Becker et al (1998), Eshleman and Guo (2014), Francis and Krishnan (1999), Francis and Wang (2008), Francis and Yu (2009), Krishnan (2003) and Lai (2013), the results in column 1 reveal that the test variable BIG4 is insignificantly associated with DA ( β = −0.000751, p = 0.172), even when the issue of auditor self-selection bias is ignored. This implies that Big N auditors do not have positive effect on restricting clients’ earnings management, which is consistent with prior studies (Ching et al, 2015; El-Dyasty and Elamer, 2020; Jeong and Rho, 2004; Kabir et al, 2011; Semba and Kato, 2018; Zhan et al, 2020). The result remains qualitatively unchanged (column 2) after addressing the potential endogeneity issue by employing the matched-pair sample procedure in the model ( β = −0.001731, p = 0.217).…”

“…In contrast, some studies fail to find any relationship between Big N auditors and audit quality (Almarayeh et al, 2020;Ching et al, 2015;El-Dyasty and Elamer, 2020;Jeong and Rho, 2004;Kabir et al, 2011;Zhan et al, 2020). For example, Baatwah et al (2018) choose the level of client absolute DAs and a GCO to proxy for audit quality.…”

The development of corporate governance literature in Malaysia: a systematic literature review and research agenda

“…The board size and government ownership are significant in explaining the quality of voluntary disclosure 3.7.4 Auditing quality. Following several scandals in the early 2000s, academic research has been motivated to investigate CG and auditing effectiveness in protecting firms' investments and shareholders' interests (El-Dyasty and Elamer, 2020). Audit effectiveness, as measured by auditing fees, is the most examined theme in this area (AlQadasi and Abidin, 2018;Bliss et al, 2007;Husnin et al, 2013Husnin et al, , 2016Johl et al, 2012;Yatim et al, 2006).…”

Sustainability assurance practices: a systematic review and future research agenda

“…The importance of assurance in emphasising sustainability has been commonly highlighted as the most important mean of mitigating the risk of environmental violations and ensuring sustainability engagement of corporations (Coyne 2006 ; Desimone et al 2020 ). According to the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA 2021 ), audit functions add value to enterprises by strengthening risk management and improving the understanding of new emergent issues such as sustainability (Abdelfattah et al 2020 ; El-Dyasty & Elamer 2020 ; Owusu et al 2020 ). Additionally, Chiang and Torng ( 2015 ) argued that the audit component is the key point in the complete infrastructure under which the organisation’s interaction with changes in the environment can be managed.…”