1981
DOI: 10.1016/0042-207x(81)90098-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of attractive lateral interactions on flash-desorption spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Niemantsverdriet and Wandelt simulated TPD spectra taking into account the compensation effect and showed that a shift in TPD peak maxima at various coverages does not necessarily reflect the expected attractive or repulsive nature of the interactions, , as one might conclude based on a Redhead analysis. Although it is generally concluded that a shift in the maximum of the TPD spectra to higher temperatures indicates attractive lateral interactions and a shift to lower temperatures indicates repulsive lateral interactions, Niemantsverdriet points out that these conclusions hold true only if the preexponential factor is constant and independent of coverage. But when the preexponential factor is not constant and is coverage dependent, the peaks may in fact shift to lower temperatures even when attractive interactions are present, or to higher temperatures even when repulsive interactions are present, especially when the interaction energy is significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niemantsverdriet and Wandelt simulated TPD spectra taking into account the compensation effect and showed that a shift in TPD peak maxima at various coverages does not necessarily reflect the expected attractive or repulsive nature of the interactions, , as one might conclude based on a Redhead analysis. Although it is generally concluded that a shift in the maximum of the TPD spectra to higher temperatures indicates attractive lateral interactions and a shift to lower temperatures indicates repulsive lateral interactions, Niemantsverdriet points out that these conclusions hold true only if the preexponential factor is constant and independent of coverage. But when the preexponential factor is not constant and is coverage dependent, the peaks may in fact shift to lower temperatures even when attractive interactions are present, or to higher temperatures even when repulsive interactions are present, especially when the interaction energy is significant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem is that for the majority of systems no quantitative experimental data are available. In principle, values for interaction energies can be extracted from measurements of the coverage dependence of adsorption energies which may be obtained by temperature programmed desorption ͑TPD͒, 8 measurements of isotherms, 9 or microcalorimetry. 10 However, these methods do not provide the distance dependence of the interactions, and a quantitative analysis of the TPD data, which are mostly the only ones available, is not unequivocal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with E 0 = E(O = 0), w the interaction energy (negative for attractive and positive for repulsive interactions), and 0 the adsorbate coverage in monolayers (ML) [1][2][3][4][5]. Calculated desorption traces based on pairwise lateral interactions between the adsorbed particles by Golze et al [5] show that in the case of first-order desorption kinetics, attractive interactions shift the desorption peaks to higher temperatures, whereas repulsive interactions shift the peaks to lower temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculated desorption traces based on pairwise lateral interactions between the adsorbed particles by Golze et al [5] show that in the case of first-order desorption kinetics, attractive interactions shift the desorption peaks to higher temperatures, whereas repulsive interactions shift the peaks to lower temperatures. These calculations, however, rest on the assump-0169-4332/88/$03.50 © Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation