1974
DOI: 10.1080/713818858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Anticipation on the Transfer Function of the Human Lens System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
45
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There have, however, been several reports that have indicated that chromatic cues are not vital to accommoReprint requests to: D. I. Flitcroft, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, England dation control (Stark & Takahashi, 1965;Troelstra et al, 1964;Van der Wildt et al, 1974). It should be noted that these studies used only small numbers of subjects, and as reported by Fincham a sizeable proportion of subjects can accommodate successfully in the absence of chromatic cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There have, however, been several reports that have indicated that chromatic cues are not vital to accommoReprint requests to: D. I. Flitcroft, St. Mary's Hospital Medical School, Norfolk Place, London W2 1PG, England dation control (Stark & Takahashi, 1965;Troelstra et al, 1964;Van der Wildt et al, 1974). It should be noted that these studies used only small numbers of subjects, and as reported by Fincham a sizeable proportion of subjects can accommodate successfully in the absence of chromatic cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Each amplitude took 30 s to complete (Figure 2). An unpredictable movement was included between amplitudes to prevent the subject from continuing on to make predictive eye movements at the frequency of the stimulus during the next, smaller amplitude stimulus (van der Wildt, Bouman, & van de Kraats, 1974). A complete trial took approximately 1 min 45 s, and proceeded continuously after it started, regardless of the attention of the subject.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, 1.75 D of defocus or 1.75 MA of disparity can drive accommodation and vergence responses without requiring significant extra-retinal cues (e.g., a sense of target proximity; Fincham, 1951; Schor, Alexander, Cormack, & Stevenson, 1992; Schor, Wood, & Ogawa, 1984; Toates, 1972). Multiple target speeds were used to minimize the potential for predictive responses (Stark, 1968; van der Wildt, Bouman, & van de Kraats, 1974). No systematic difference in performance was noted across different target speeds and therefore the responses from all three target speeds were pooled during analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%