2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0554-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of anterior cruciate ligament recontruction on lower extremity relative phase dynamics during walking and running

Abstract: The purpose of this investigation was to use relative phase dynamics to evaluate gait in individuals with a reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) during walking and running. Relative phase dynamics can describe the coordination strategies between the interacting segments at the lower extremity. Ten subjects who had undergone ACL reconstruction using the central third of their patellar tendon and ten healthy controls walked and ran on a treadmill at a self-selected pace. Relative phase dynamics were ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean knee stiffness observed in the present sample was comparable to values reported previously in healthy males (Horita et al, 2002) (Table 5). However, the group average for sagittal leg-thigh coordination (MARP1) was lower than that during walking and running in healthy participants (Kurz et al, 2005). Withinparticipant variability was also less for MARP1 and greater for MARP2 (Table 5) compared to a previous study of a cross-cutting manoeuvre during a running task (Pollard et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The mean knee stiffness observed in the present sample was comparable to values reported previously in healthy males (Horita et al, 2002) (Table 5). However, the group average for sagittal leg-thigh coordination (MARP1) was lower than that during walking and running in healthy participants (Kurz et al, 2005). Withinparticipant variability was also less for MARP1 and greater for MARP2 (Table 5) compared to a previous study of a cross-cutting manoeuvre during a running task (Pollard et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In fact, this relationship is so standard that it is possible to determine the bounds of normal walking and use these to define abnormal locomotion (Schwartz et al, 2008;Lythgo et al, 2011;Dixon et al, 2014). A different, but equally consistent relationship exists for human running (Kurz et al, 2005;Perry and Burnfield, 2010;Hein et al, 2012;Floría et al, 2018). However, documenting the gait parameters used in a given circumstance does little to explain why these are the particular movement strategies (nearly) universally selected.…”
Section: The Energetic Basis For Gait Parameter Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All significance tests were performed at a predetermined alpha level of 0.05. Although no power calculation was made, the sample size was based on studies published in the literature (see Coury et al 17 , Manal et al 22 , Kurz et al 23 , Lavcanska, Taylor e Schache 24 ).…”
Section: Knee Torque and Eccentric Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%