1968
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2744(68)90119-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of angiotensin on renal carbonic anhydrase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in contrast to angiotensin, acetazolamide does not increase chloride excretion (Berliner et al, 1951). Further, angiotensin does not inhibit rabbit renal carbonic anhydrase in vifro (Healy & Douglas, 1968). Clearly, angiotensin does not cause natriuresis primarily by inhibition of carbonic anhydrase in the kidney.…”
Section: Discussiwmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, in contrast to angiotensin, acetazolamide does not increase chloride excretion (Berliner et al, 1951). Further, angiotensin does not inhibit rabbit renal carbonic anhydrase in vifro (Healy & Douglas, 1968). Clearly, angiotensin does not cause natriuresis primarily by inhibition of carbonic anhydrase in the kidney.…”
Section: Discussiwmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The natriuresis is apparently due to an inhibition of tubular reabsorptive capacity, but angiotensin does not inhibit active sodium transport in isolated amphibian skin (McAfee & Locke, 1967) or isolated, perfused rabbit proximal tubules (Burg & Orloff, 1968). In addition, no inhibitory effect could be detected on renal carbonic anhydrase (Healey & Douglas, 1968) or Na-K activated adenosine triphosphatase activity (Bonting, Canady & Hawkins, 1964).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%