1972
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of angiotensin, noradrenaline and vasopressin on blood flow distribution in the rat kidney

Abstract: SUMMARY1. The effect of val5-angiotensin II amide, noradrenaline and vasopressin, on kidney volume and intrarenal distribution of carbon particles and thioflavine S was examined in the rat.2. Angiotensin produced a dose-dependent shrinkage of the kidney coinciding with the rise in systemic blood pressure. Noradrenaline and vasopressin, however, produced reduction in kidney volume only in much higher doses than were necessary to produce a pressor effect.3. An intravenous infusion of angiotensin sufficient to pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are similar to the fi ndings reported by Burke et al ( 6 ) where heterogeneous distribution of a tissue-trapping BF tracer was seen on PET images after angiotensin II was infused into the hepatic arteries of patients with colorectal liver metastases. The observed spatial heterogeneity is consistent with the vasoconstrictor exerting its effects primarily on smaller distal arterial branches, as has been shown in the kidney (27)(28)(29). This explanation is supported by the results reported by Ekelund and Lunderquist ( 1 ) showing that after hepatic pharmacoangiography performed with angiotensin II, a marked slowing of BF through the peripheral hepatic arterial branches was generally seen, to the extent that some small vessels were still fi lled with contrast material 10-12 seconds after the injection, which occurred 10-20 seconds after the delivery of angiotensin II.…”
Section: Practical Applicationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These results are similar to the fi ndings reported by Burke et al ( 6 ) where heterogeneous distribution of a tissue-trapping BF tracer was seen on PET images after angiotensin II was infused into the hepatic arteries of patients with colorectal liver metastases. The observed spatial heterogeneity is consistent with the vasoconstrictor exerting its effects primarily on smaller distal arterial branches, as has been shown in the kidney (27)(28)(29). This explanation is supported by the results reported by Ekelund and Lunderquist ( 1 ) showing that after hepatic pharmacoangiography performed with angiotensin II, a marked slowing of BF through the peripheral hepatic arterial branches was generally seen, to the extent that some small vessels were still fi lled with contrast material 10-12 seconds after the injection, which occurred 10-20 seconds after the delivery of angiotensin II.…”
Section: Practical Applicationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In general, the present effects of Ang-I1 on BP and LRBF correspond well with previous results obtained in the rat by other methods (FINBERG & PEART 1972, RENTSCH et coll. 1976, ARENDSHORST & FINN 1977 as well as in the dog by the present technique (AUKLAND).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Fourman & Kennedy, 1966;Aukland, 1968;Fisher, Griinfeld & Barger, 1970;Finberg & Peart, 1972; Banks, 1976;Akatsuka, Moran, Morgan & Wilson, 1977;Johnson, Park & Malvin, 1977). One probable explanation for this lack of agreement is the variety of techniques used for assessing intrarenal blood flow, some being more reliable than others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%