2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12868-018-0476-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of anesthetic dose on the motor response induced by low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation

Abstract: BackgroundLow-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) has been proven to be a noninvasive method with high spatial resolution and deep penetration. Previous studies have qualitatively demonstrated that the electromyographic response caused by LIPUS in the mouse motor cortex is affected by the anesthetic state of the mice. However, the quantitative relationship between motor response and anesthetic dose remains unclear.ResultsExperimental results show that the success rate decreases stepwise as the isof… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitude and success rate of EMG decreased as the intensity of ultrasound decreased, as well as the response latency of EMG increased as the concentrations of anesthesia increased. Research on TUS has shown that as the depth of anesthesia increases, the success rate of EMG decreases and EMG response latency increases significantly (Yuan et al, 2018), and this study has shown that TMAS followed the same rule. Nevertheless, EMG amplitude induced by TMAS is higher and its EMG response latency is smaller than that induced by TUS under the same experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The amplitude and success rate of EMG decreased as the intensity of ultrasound decreased, as well as the response latency of EMG increased as the concentrations of anesthesia increased. Research on TUS has shown that as the depth of anesthesia increases, the success rate of EMG decreases and EMG response latency increases significantly (Yuan et al, 2018), and this study has shown that TMAS followed the same rule. Nevertheless, EMG amplitude induced by TMAS is higher and its EMG response latency is smaller than that induced by TUS under the same experimental conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Most of the previous studies conducted on anesthetized animals showed significant variability in the response to stimulation depending on the type and depth of anesthesia [73, 91]. To examine response to stimulation without the confounding effects from anesthesia, experiments in an awake setting are required, and several recent studies on non-human primates and human subjects have started to demonstrate the feasibility of FUS in brain stimulation without the use of anesthesia [33, 34, 3743].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that enhancement or suppression of neural activity induced by TUS will be affected by the anesthesia dose. For instance, if the anesthesia dose is too high, the animal’s motion response and EEG signal of the motor cortex cannot be observed after ultrasound stimulation ( 18 20 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%