2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01503-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of anesthesia depth on radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study

Abstract: Background Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) as a safe and effective method has been widely used in ventricular tachycardia (VT) patients, and with which anesthesiologists frequently manage their perioperative care. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different anesthetic depths on perioperative RFCA and recurrence in patients who with intractable VT and could not tolerate an awake procedure. Methods We reviewed electronic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of anesthesia on VT in structural heart disease showed in one report that GA does not prevent VT inducibility in most patients, nor affect acute ablation success [ 17 ]. Another report in that setting recommended maintaining appropriate depth of GA, as deeper levels showed a higher risk of VT non-inducibility affecting postprocedural outcome [ 18 ]. Regarding the effect of anesthesia type on PVC ablation procedures, there is little literature to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of anesthesia on VT in structural heart disease showed in one report that GA does not prevent VT inducibility in most patients, nor affect acute ablation success [ 17 ]. Another report in that setting recommended maintaining appropriate depth of GA, as deeper levels showed a higher risk of VT non-inducibility affecting postprocedural outcome [ 18 ]. Regarding the effect of anesthesia type on PVC ablation procedures, there is little literature to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%