2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of an intruded event on peak-interval timing in rats: Isolation of a postcue effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lengthening effect is also entirely consistent with findings on fear conditioning in animals (e.g. Brown, Richer & Doyère, 2007;Meck, 1983) and human adults using electric shocks or aversive sounds (Droit-Volet, Mermillod, Cocenas & Gil, 2010a;Falk & Bindra, 1954;Hare, 1963). For example, Droit-Volet et al (2010a) showed that the expectation of a fearful sound (50-ms burst of 95-dB white noise) that hurts the ears and produces a defensive startle reflex shifts the psychophysical function toward the left in a temporal bisection task, compared with that of a non-aversive sound (50-ms beep), or no sound, consistent with a fear-related temporal lengthening effect (Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Negative High-arousal Emotion On Time Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This lengthening effect is also entirely consistent with findings on fear conditioning in animals (e.g. Brown, Richer & Doyère, 2007;Meck, 1983) and human adults using electric shocks or aversive sounds (Droit-Volet, Mermillod, Cocenas & Gil, 2010a;Falk & Bindra, 1954;Hare, 1963). For example, Droit-Volet et al (2010a) showed that the expectation of a fearful sound (50-ms burst of 95-dB white noise) that hurts the ears and produces a defensive startle reflex shifts the psychophysical function toward the left in a temporal bisection task, compared with that of a non-aversive sound (50-ms beep), or no sound, consistent with a fear-related temporal lengthening effect (Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Negative High-arousal Emotion On Time Perceptionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consequently, presenting an emotionally arousing stimulus during reproduction may distract subjects from the dimension of time leading to overestimation during reproduction. Brown et al (2007), using a similar procedure, found that rats’ responses to fearful stimuli led to overestimations during reproduction and Aum et al (2004) demonstrated similar effects when pigeons were presented with a positive food reward during production trials. Combined these results demonstrate that positive and negative stimuli may sometimes be overestimated during reproduction because they distract attention from the non-emotional details, including time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…If a condition continuously alters attention allocation towards time, the distortions in timing will be proportional to the cue duration (e.g., a 10% effect on pulse accumulation will result in a 10% change in subjective duration for all intervals — Droit-Volet et al, 2004; Effron et al, 2006). In contrast, if switch latency were altered, this would affect all target durations by the same absolute amount (Brown et al, 2007; Lejeune, 1998). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, an over-reset strategy has been previously reported only when rodents were presented with emotionally-charged distracters (e.g., stimuli previously paired with footshock) [13, 14], but not by manipulating the intensity of a neutral noise distracter [15]. To date, this is the first study in which mice have been tested with various distracters, and the first report of an over-reset after an interruption by neutral stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, presentation of novel neutral distracters during the uninterrupted to-be-timed stimulus considerably delays responding, suggesting rats fail to devote attentional resources to timing, do not retain the pre-gap interval in working memory, and restart timing after the distracter, using a “reset” mode [reviewed in 12]. Moreover, emotional distracters (e.g., previously paired with footshock) delay timing much longer than a reset [13, 14], suggesting that rats fail to switch attentional resources back to timing long after the end of the distracter, in an “over-reset” mode. To date, no “over-reset” has been reported following neutral distracters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%