2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of an aphasia ID card on the processing of language produced by a speaker with nonfluent aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to comprehension challenges, we expected that self-advocacy scripts would increase listeners' sustained attention to the speakers' language content, which would help them meet the challenges of comprehending the speakers. In a previous study, we found that listeners who viewed an aphasia ID card showed greater sustained attention to the language content of a speaker with aphasia than those who did not (Ward & Mack, 2022). Similarly, self-disclosure of stuttering has been shown to improve listeners' attention to the speaker (Byrd, Croft, et al, 2017;Werle et al, 2023).…”
Section: Thoughts and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…With respect to comprehension challenges, we expected that self-advocacy scripts would increase listeners' sustained attention to the speakers' language content, which would help them meet the challenges of comprehending the speakers. In a previous study, we found that listeners who viewed an aphasia ID card showed greater sustained attention to the language content of a speaker with aphasia than those who did not (Ward & Mack, 2022). Similarly, self-disclosure of stuttering has been shown to improve listeners' attention to the speaker (Byrd, Croft, et al, 2017;Werle et al, 2023).…”
Section: Thoughts and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Only one third of the experimental trials had a cloze that fit the linguistic context. Listeners are able to adapt to speakers who are known to be unreliable (e.g., Brothers et al, 2019 ), to have a communication disorder (e.g., Ward and Mack, 2022 ), or to have “non-native” speaker status (e.g., Bosker et al, 2019 ). Additionally, recent ERP research indicates that task-related goals affect the generation of lexical predictions ( Brothers et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%