2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Altered Hand Position and Motor Skills on Stereognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carlson et al showed that normal subjects had decreased stereognosis when placed in a simulated hemiplegic hand position compared with a normal hand position, highlighting the importance of hand mobility. 9 Dahlin et al showed improvement in stereognosis 6 and 18 months after reconstructive hand surgery in patients with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. 10 In a published correspondence regarding their study, Dahlin et al suggest that this improvement in stereognosis could be explained both by improved exposure of the objects to palm and finger pulps after the surgical reconstruction and by cerebral plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Carlson et al showed that normal subjects had decreased stereognosis when placed in a simulated hemiplegic hand position compared with a normal hand position, highlighting the importance of hand mobility. 9 Dahlin et al showed improvement in stereognosis 6 and 18 months after reconstructive hand surgery in patients with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. 10 In a published correspondence regarding their study, Dahlin et al suggest that this improvement in stereognosis could be explained both by improved exposure of the objects to palm and finger pulps after the surgical reconstruction and by cerebral plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, failure to identify some objects by touch might result from manipulative deficits, rather than from real sensory impairments (3). Carlson and Brooks (44) showed that healthy individuals presented reduced S when placed in a simulated hemiplegic hand position compared to a normal hand position. Other studies have confirmed the importance of hand mobility in object recognition, through the moderate associations between S and dexterity (4549).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid confusion, evaluation of graphaesthesia and MFP was limited to studies using the SIPT, rather than the earlier test version known as the Southern California Sensory Integration Test (SCSIT) (Ayres, 1972). Nineteen tests were excluded because of inconsistency in methodology and a lack of clinimetric data, including 11 tests of stereognosis (Bolanos, Bleck, Firestone, & Young, 1989;Carlson & Brooks, 2009;Goldner & Ferlic, 1966;Guzzetta et al, 2007;Hohman, Baker, & Reed, 1958;Krumlinde-Sundholm & Eliasson, 2002;Tachdjian & Minear, 1958;Van Heest et al, 1993;Wilson & Wilson, 1967;Wilton, 2003;Yekutiel, Jariwala, & Stretch, 1994), four tests of texture discrimination (Bleyenheuft, Wilmotte, & Thonnard, 2010;Hohman et al, 1958;Sanger & Kukke, 2007;Wingert, Burford, Sinclair, Brunstrom, & Damiano, 2008), two of graphaesthesia (Guzzetta et al, 2007;Russo, Miller, Haan, Cameron, & Crotty, 2008), and four of localization or DS (Hohman et al, 1958;Smith, Walker, & Myers, 1988;Weidenbacker, 1962). The Tactile Behavior Observation Scale (Clayton, 2004) was excluded, as it examines behavioral responses to tactile stimuli and not registration or perception directly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%