1983
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80290-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of aglycosylation on the binding of mouse IgG to staphylococcal protein A

Abstract: IgG produced by hybridoma cells cultured in the presence of tunicamycin was compared with normal IgG for its ability to bind to staphylococcal protein A. No differences were found in binding or elution profiles. It is concluded that aglycosylation does not produce major structural alterations at the &2-t&3 interface of the Fc region of IgG. Mouse IgG2a Staphyiococcal protein A Tunicamycin RoIe of carbohydrate Aglycosylation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treated IgG was applied to a membrane in serial dilutions and probed with radiolabeled, purified protein H. This revealed that protein H bound IgG to the same extent irrespective of EndoS treatment and indicated that the Fc‐binding capacity of protein H is not influenced by EndoS (Figure 8A). This was also the case for staphylococcal protein A, which bound to both intact and EndoS‐treated IgG (data not shown), as previously described for aglycosyl mouse IgG (Leatherbarrow and Dwek, 1983; Nose and Wigzell, 1983).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treated IgG was applied to a membrane in serial dilutions and probed with radiolabeled, purified protein H. This revealed that protein H bound IgG to the same extent irrespective of EndoS treatment and indicated that the Fc‐binding capacity of protein H is not influenced by EndoS (Figure 8A). This was also the case for staphylococcal protein A, which bound to both intact and EndoS‐treated IgG (data not shown), as previously described for aglycosyl mouse IgG (Leatherbarrow and Dwek, 1983; Nose and Wigzell, 1983).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal stability and functionality of the CH2 domains of IgG are progressively reduced with successive removal of outer-arm sugar residues [60]. Aglycosylated IgG fails to activate complement [19], is more liable to proteolytic attack [18] and is not recognized by cells expressing FccRI and II receptors [61]. Furthermore, removal of the complete carbohydrate moiety abolished the ability to activate complement and ADCC of a human IgG1 mAb, Campath-1H, but left the antigen and protein A binding activities intact, whereas removal of terminal sialic acid residues through glycopeptidase-F digestion did not affect any of Figure 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifications in these oligosaccharides affect susceptibility to proteolytic degradation, clearance rate, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), as well as complement activation apart from binding to FcR, monocytes, protein G and C1q/C1 [12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, Fc glycosylation is not required for either protein A binding [18] or recognition of antigen [19][20][21][22]. Recently, de-fucosylation on the N297-linked glycan in the Fc part of the Ab has been shown to increase ADCC activity, indicating the importance of glyco-engineering of Ab for improved clinical efficacy [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aglycosylated IgG, obtained by culturing IgG-producing cell lines in the presence of tunicamycin, has been shown to lack several important biological functions, e.g. binding to monocyte FcyRI receptor (Leatherbarrow et al, 1985;Walker et al, 1989), to display decreased complement activation (Nose & Wigzell, 1983;Leatherbarrow & Dwek, 1983) and to display increased susceptibility to proteolysis (Leatherbarrow & Dwek, 1983). However, glycopeptides isolated after proteolytic digestion of IgG have not been demonstrated to have biological activity, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%