1972
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1972.10481264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Aggregation on Prediction in the Autoregressive Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If disaggregate data is available it was found that forecasting the disaggregate series and then aggregating the forecasts may be preferable to forecasting the aggregate series directly. Such results were found for both temporal as well as contemporaneous aggregation (e.g., Amemiya and Wu (1972), Wei (1978), Lütkepohl (1986Lütkepohl ( , 1987Lütkepohl ( , 2006, Silvestrini, Salto, Moulin and Veredas (2008)). Many of the available results relate to linear aggregation, however.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…If disaggregate data is available it was found that forecasting the disaggregate series and then aggregating the forecasts may be preferable to forecasting the aggregate series directly. Such results were found for both temporal as well as contemporaneous aggregation (e.g., Amemiya and Wu (1972), Wei (1978), Lütkepohl (1986Lütkepohl ( , 1987Lütkepohl ( , 2006, Silvestrini, Salto, Moulin and Veredas (2008)). Many of the available results relate to linear aggregation, however.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…If disaggregate data is available it was found that forecasting the disaggregate series and then aggregating the forecasts may be preferable to forecasting the aggregate series directly. Such results were found for both temporal as well as contemporaneous aggregation (e.g., Amemiya and Wu (1972), Wei (1978), Lütkepohl (1986Lütkepohl ( , 1987Lütkepohl ( , 2006, Silvestrini, Salto, Moulin and Veredas (2008)). Many of the available results relate to linear aggregation, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Studying its effects on univariate time series models goes back to the seminal work of Amemiya and Wu (1972), Tiao (1972) and Brewer (1973). The theoretical results on ARIMA processes from these papers are summarised by Rossana and Seater (1995) as being threefold: (a) temporal aggregation contaminates/complicates the dynamics of the underlying ARIMA(p, d, q) process through the moving average component (they refer to this as the Brewer effect); (b) as the level of aggregation increases the process at the aggregate level is simplified and converges to an IMA(d, d) (they call this the Tiao effect); and (c) aggregation causes loss in the number of observations resulting in a loss in estimation efficiency (they call this the sample size effect).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%