1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf03324152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of age on the level of human ABO blood group antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although episodes of haemolysis in the recipients were not determined in this study so as to justify the clinical significance of such antibodies, it will be an overstatement to state that the frequency of strongly lytic anti-A and anti-B is low in this study. Taking a visual titre of 8 and above as being able to cause significant in vivo haemolysis [13], only 0.4% of the sera positive for alphahaemolysin and 0.2% of those positive for beta-haemolysin had significant visual titre of 8. Similarly, a titre of 16 was seen in only 0.2% for haemolytic anti-A and 0.1% for haemolytic anti-B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although episodes of haemolysis in the recipients were not determined in this study so as to justify the clinical significance of such antibodies, it will be an overstatement to state that the frequency of strongly lytic anti-A and anti-B is low in this study. Taking a visual titre of 8 and above as being able to cause significant in vivo haemolysis [13], only 0.4% of the sera positive for alphahaemolysin and 0.2% of those positive for beta-haemolysin had significant visual titre of 8. Similarly, a titre of 16 was seen in only 0.2% for haemolytic anti-A and 0.1% for haemolytic anti-B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…18.6% of samples thus had visual titres of 8 and above which is able to cause significant in vivo hemolysis. [13,16] This finding is similar to that reported by Adewuyi et al among black Zimbabweans [6] but higher than that reported by Olawumi and Olatunji who found a significant prevalence titre of 2.0% for anti-A and 2.8% for anti-B [8] and Kagu et al that found prevalence of 0.4% for anti-A and 0.2% for anti-B. [17] Such difference may be explained by the large sample size used by Kagu et al compared with that used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This higher finding can be explained by the higher prevalence of hemolysins in Black population. Visual titres of hemolysins of 8 and above have been associated with significant in vivo hemolysis [ 17 , 23 ]. Assuming those with significant visual titre as being capable of leading to severe ABO HDN, potentially 2.7% of deliveries (18.6% of 14.3% deliveries) will have moderately severe to severe ABO HDN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%