2001
DOI: 10.1023/a:1010627527026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultasonography

Abstract: Sensitivity of both mammography and sensitivity of US are independently related both to the age of the patient and to the density of the breast. The effect of age is inverse and that of density parallel between mammography and US on sensitivity. The effect of overall breast density was close to the effect of density at the site of the tumour on the sensitivity of both mammography and US.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
68
1
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
68
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be tempting to interpret this as an indication of lowered screening sensitivity. Use of hormone replacement theraphy, an important determinant of interval cancer 7,27,29 due to increase in breast density, 30,31 almost doubled in the study period 32 and was on a higher level compared to that in the Netherlands 33 or Norway. [34][35][36] Another explanation is an increase in diagnostic activity other than screening due to improved access to diagnostic services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It would be tempting to interpret this as an indication of lowered screening sensitivity. Use of hormone replacement theraphy, an important determinant of interval cancer 7,27,29 due to increase in breast density, 30,31 almost doubled in the study period 32 and was on a higher level compared to that in the Netherlands 33 or Norway. [34][35][36] Another explanation is an increase in diagnostic activity other than screening due to improved access to diagnostic services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, both methods present some limitations. Mammography performed in dense breasts may often yield false-negative results [1]. US is sensitive in the detection of lesions, but specificity is poor as most solid lesions are benign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many published studies have confirmed that the sensitivity of mammography increases with age. 9,10 The sensitivity of mammography may be decreased further in women who carry a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2; pilot studies evaluating mammography in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers have found a high rate of false-negative results. 6,11,12 This may be attributable both to increased breast density in young women and to tumor phenotype, including features such as pushing margins, which may contribute to a smooth appearance rather than a spiculated appearance of a mass on mammography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%