“…The abstracts of 195 studies were reviewed, and 179 were discarded for incompatibility with the outcomes examined in this systematic review study and their greater emphasis on prenatal outcomes. Finally, 16 studies(14 studies in English and 2 studies in Persian) with a total of 3,605 participants were included in this systematic review, including 6 from Spain (Barakat et al., , 2009 , 2012 , 2014 , 2018 ; Perales, Calabria, et al., 2016 ; Rodriguez‐Diaz et al., 2017 ), one from the United States (Price et al., 2012 ), five from Iran (Ghodsi & Asltoghiri, 2014 ; Memari et al., 2006 ; Tab ari et al., 2010 ; Toosi & Akbarzadeh, 2016 ; Zarezadeh & Nemati, 2016 ), two from Norway (Haakstad & Bø, 2011 ; Sanda et al., 2018 ), one from Brazil (da Silva et al., 2017 ) and one from Sweden (Salvesen et al., 2014 ), and nine meta‐analyses were ultimately carried out. Motahhari's study (Tab ari et al., 2010 ) had the lowest number of participants ( n = 44) and da Silva's (da Silva et al., 2017 ) the highest ( n = 611).…”