2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of access to water, sanitation and handwashing facilities on child growth indicators: Evidence from the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016

Abstract: Introduction Poor access to water, sanitation, and handwashing (WASH) facilities frequently contribute to child growth failure. The role of access to WASH facilities on child growth outcomes in Ethiopia is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine individual and combined effects of access to WASH facilities on child growth outcomes. Methods Data for this analysis was sourced from the recent Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS) 2016. A multivariable logistic regression model was applied t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
50
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are presented in Table 4. Interestingly, we find no significant improvement in outcomes among those in the bottom quartile, which echoes previous findings (Bekele et al., 2020). However, we find statistically significant and increasing effects in the top three quartiles.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results are presented in Table 4. Interestingly, we find no significant improvement in outcomes among those in the bottom quartile, which echoes previous findings (Bekele et al., 2020). However, we find statistically significant and increasing effects in the top three quartiles.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Washing hands with soap and water also helps in the reduction of respiratory tract infections, and stunting among children. 30 - 32 This difference might be due to sampling size, study design, setting, climate, tradition, poverty status, and water sanitation and hygiene intervention strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure sample size sufficiency, sample size was calculated using the prevalence of stunting (46%) [8] which was 382, calculated using a factor of unsafe water source which was a significant predictor of stunting [17] which was 320, and also the sample size was calculated using combined WASH variables which were significant predictors of stunting [18] which was 204. However, the total sample size calculated using all others was less than the one calculated using the prevalence of stunting.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination and Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%