2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6156.2012.01082.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Abnormal Turnover on Asymmetric Autoregressive Behavior of Index Returns: Evidence from the Chinese A‐share Stock Markets*

Abstract: This study tests the effect of turnover shocks on the asymmetric autoregressive behavior of index returns. The methodological approach adopted in this study is based on the relationship between market return and trading volume. This study first uses a vector autoregression (VAR) to model two market trading volume series by controlling for the variation associated with the sign and magnitude of both week t and week t − 1 or week t + 1 market returns. The generated market‐adjusted relative turnover (MRTO) series… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be useful to conduct an international study that includes data from other emerging markets and developed markets, but this is not possible given the data availability. Since the market structure in China is different from that in other markets (Hsiao and Tu, ), and the key mechanism underlying the price underreaction may also be different across countries, we must interpret our results with caution in terms of generalizing the conclusions to other markets.…”
Section: Data and Variable Measurementmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…It would be useful to conduct an international study that includes data from other emerging markets and developed markets, but this is not possible given the data availability. Since the market structure in China is different from that in other markets (Hsiao and Tu, ), and the key mechanism underlying the price underreaction may also be different across countries, we must interpret our results with caution in terms of generalizing the conclusions to other markets.…”
Section: Data and Variable Measurementmentioning
confidence: 82%