2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a protagonist’s emotional shift on situation model construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are not consistent with those of prior studies of words or sentences (e.g., Fischer & Zwaan, 2008), but do point to a phenomenon that is particular to the reading of relatively long stories. This phenomenon is congruent with previous psychological and literary research (Larsen & Seilman, 1988;Miall & Kuiken, 1999;Komeda & Kusumi, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are not consistent with those of prior studies of words or sentences (e.g., Fischer & Zwaan, 2008), but do point to a phenomenon that is particular to the reading of relatively long stories. This phenomenon is congruent with previous psychological and literary research (Larsen & Seilman, 1988;Miall & Kuiken, 1999;Komeda & Kusumi, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Second, if perceptual memory interacted with the emotional processes that arise during reading, especially during the reading of relatively long texts, the perceptual memory retrieval task would be associated with increased RTs, given the extra processing found in prior studies. Komeda and Kusumi (2006) showed that readers generally monitor emotional shifts, causing increased RTs for sentences involving emotional shifts. In particular, Cupchik and László (1994) showed that RTs were longer for texts containing more meaningful comments about life and more evocative images.…”
Section: Hypotheses and Overview Of The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggested that due to the attention-grabbing quality of negative information, negative endings are devoted more careful processing or are more difficult to integrate. It is possible, however, that increased latencies for negative endings may reflect readers' updating of characters' emotional status (as in Komeda & Kusumi, 2006). Readers may tend to attribute a mildly positive emotional state to the story characters as a default and therefore need to update their model of characters' emotional status when the character experiences a negative event.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, according to Goldie (1999), readers can maintain a certain observer's position when involved in empathic processes, they still anticipate how the main protagonist is going to behave and how he or she is going to feel. Some researchers on emotional inferences have strongly suggested that empathy was an important factor in the representation of emotions during reading (e.g., Komeda & Kusumi, 2006). More empathic readers may therefore build complex representations of emotions.…”
Section: Running Head: Individual Differences and Emotional Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%