2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-0987(03)00178-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a PEG versus a chitosan coating on the interaction of drug colloidal carriers with the ocular mucosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
2
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
93
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…53 However, the ex vivo study was performed in the absence of enzymes and mucin and, consequently, the expected positive effect of PEG coating was not evident. 54 Results obtained in vivo by other authors demonstrated the increase in ocular bioavailability by PEG coating of these colloidal systems. 8 Results showed that there was a significant decrease in P app when HPβCD was added to the formulations.…”
Section: Corneal Permeation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…53 However, the ex vivo study was performed in the absence of enzymes and mucin and, consequently, the expected positive effect of PEG coating was not evident. 54 Results obtained in vivo by other authors demonstrated the increase in ocular bioavailability by PEG coating of these colloidal systems. 8 Results showed that there was a significant decrease in P app when HPβCD was added to the formulations.…”
Section: Corneal Permeation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Namely, (1) they are able to associate great amounts of DNA, thus allowing the amount of polymer used for in vivo transfection purposes to be minimized, (2) they have a very small size, a feature which is known to be critical for the adequate interaction with the ocular mucosa 28 and (3) their surface charge can be modulated depending on the HA-CS ratio. This modulation is important since a positive charge is supposed to facilitate the interaction of the nanoparticles with the ocular surface, 23,29 whereas the disposition of HA onto the surface of the nanoparticles may also play a role in their interaction with epithelial cells. 20,21 In order to evaluate the efficacy of the nanoparticles as ocular gene carriers, a cell culture model derived from HCE cells was used prior to the in vivo studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 For example, we have previously found that CS-based nanoparticles remain associated to the ocular mucosa for extended periods of time and provide high concentrations of the encapsulated drug on the target site with minimal systemic exposure. 15,23 Overall, this information has led us to the assumption that nanoparticles made of the polysaccharides HA and CS could be of interest for the topical administration of genes onto the eye surface. Consequently, the main goal of the present work was to evaluate the potential of these nanoparticles as gene carriers for the treatment of ocular diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, the use of monolayers to generate desired surface states for biosensing is discussed below. Surface modification has been essential for biosensors to immobilize affinity tags for binding of target molecules to surfaces [133][134][135][136][137][138]. For example, several platforms for cell, protein and DNA assays have been investigated [74,[139][140][141][142][143][144].…”
Section: (C) Surface Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%