1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-4944(81)80040-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a noise abatement program on reading ability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, worse reading comprehension scores were found for children in classrooms on the noisy side of a school building facing a railway line than for children on the less noisy side. 15 The differences in reading ability between the groups disappeared in a follow-up study 16 after a noise-abatement programme, which equated the noise levels on the front and back sides of the building. Similarly, Hygge et al 14 compared two experimental groups (old airport and new airport; known as the Munich Airport Study) exposed to aircraft noise and two control groups that had little exposure to aircraft noise on reading, memory and attention in a prospective study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, worse reading comprehension scores were found for children in classrooms on the noisy side of a school building facing a railway line than for children on the less noisy side. 15 The differences in reading ability between the groups disappeared in a follow-up study 16 after a noise-abatement programme, which equated the noise levels on the front and back sides of the building. Similarly, Hygge et al 14 compared two experimental groups (old airport and new airport; known as the Munich Airport Study) exposed to aircraft noise and two control groups that had little exposure to aircraft noise on reading, memory and attention in a prospective study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bronzaft and McCarthy (1975) reported worse reading comprehension for children in classrooms on the noisy side of a school building facing a railway line than for children on the less noisy side, and this gap increased with age. After a noise-abatement programme, which equated the noise levels on the front and back sides of the building, the differences in reading ability disappeared (Bronzaft, 1981). Cohen et al (1980) found no cross-sectional effects of aircraft noise on reading ability and mathematical skills, but reported a marginal improvement after a reduction of aircraft noise of 7 dBA (Cohen et al, 1981(Cohen et al, , 1986.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was the request of this mother that led me to carry out a study on the effects of elevated train noise on learning [19]. When we found that by the sixth grade children exposed to the passing train noise were nearly a year behind in reading compared to children on the quiet side of the school building, we then were able to use the data to abate the train noise by to persuade the Transit Authority to put rubber padding on the tracks adjacent to the school and the Board of Education to acoustically tile the classroom ceilings.…”
Section: Policy Decisions Should Reflect Research Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%