The effect of a multicomponent intervention to promote community activity on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial

Bae, Sejong; Lee, Sang Yoon; Lee, Sungchul; Jung, Songee; Makino, Keitaro; Harada, Kazuhiro; Harada, Kenji; Shinkai, Yohei; Chiba, Ippei; Shimada, Hiroyuki

doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.011

Cited by 60 publications

(90 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A total of 17 articles compared the EFs of older adults between a combined intervention group and a control group [34,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. As shown in Figure 2, the effect of the combined interventions was significantly better than that of the control group (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.14, 0.39], p < 0.01).…”

Section: 2 Combined Interventions Vs the Control Groupmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Combined Physical and Cognitive Interventions on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Guo

Zang

Klich

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Both physical exercise and cognitive training can effectively improve executive functions in older adults. However, whether physical activity combined with cognitive training is more effective than a single intervention remains controversial. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of combined physical and cognitive interventions on executive functions in older adults aged 65–80 years old. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of combined physical and cognitive interventions on executive functions in older adults were searched using the Web of Science, Elsevier Science, PubMed, EBSCO, Springer-Link, and NATURE databases. Data extraction and quality evaluation were done by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, V3. Results: A total of 21 studies were included. The results showed that the combined physical and cognitive interventions produced significantly larger gains in executive functions, compared to the control group (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.14, 0.39], p < 0.01). Furthermore, the effects of the combined physical and cognitive interventions were moderated by the study quality, intervention length, and intervention frequency. No significant differences were found between the combined interventions and the physical intervention alone (SMD = 0.13, 95% CI [−0.07, 0.33], p > 0.05) or the cognitive intervention alone (SMD = 0.13, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.30], p > 0.05). Conclusions: The combined physical and cognitive interventions effectively delayed the decrease of executive functions in older adults and this effect was influenced by the length and frequency of the intervention as well as the research quality. However, the effect of the combined physical and cognitive interventions was not significantly better than that of each intervention alone.

show abstract

Section: 2 Combined Interventions Vs the Control Groupmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Combined Physical and Cognitive Interventions on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Guo

Zang

Klich

et al. 2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Satisfaction rate was only reported in two studies. 28,29 One reported that most participants were "very much" satisfied with their interventions 29 and another reported that 96.1% of the participants were satisfied with the overall program. 28…”

Section: Satisfaction Ratementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Few studies reported the number of people invited before screening, with the invitation rates ranging variously from 9% to 96%. Among these studies, different invitation methods were applied, such as calling through electoral registers, 30,31 recruiting from other projects, 28,29 or inviting via multiple ways. 32 Region may be the potential factors affecting the invitation rate.…”

Section: Recruitmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recruitment and adherence of randomized controlled trials for mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Sun

Zhang

et al. 2020

Int J Geriat Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The recruitment and adherence status of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for population with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are little known. We aimed to explore the RCT recruitment and adherence status and factors associated with these among MCI patients. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and PsycARTICLES from inception to 8th July 2019. Included studies were RCTs conducted among MCI patients with available data of invitation rate, eligibility rate, randomization rate, recruitment rate, adherence rate, satisfaction rate, or potential barrier for recruitment and compliance. Two authors screened the studies and extracted the data independently. We calculated pooled proportions of each rate and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random‐effects meta‐analysis. Meta‐regression and subgroup analysis was conducted. Results Hundred and ten articles were judged to meet the study inclusion criteria from 10 387 articles. The invitation rates ranged from 9% to96% but were not pooled together due to high heterogeneity. The pooled overall eligibility, randomization, recruitment, intervention adherence, and follow‐up adherence rates were 55% (95% CI: 48%‐62%), 86% (95% CI: 81%‐91%), 44% (95% CI: 37%‐50%), 88% (95% CI: 86%‐90%), and 85% (95% CI: 83%‐87%), respectively. Non‐MCI (47.5%), disease or medical problems (13.8%), and loss of interest (8.5%) were the most frequent reasons for screen failure. Refusal without reason (36.6%), adverse events (30.9%), and health issues (7.7%) were the most frequent reasons for drop‐out. Conclusions This study provided important information for future RCTs targeting at MCI patients. Strategies designed to improve participant recruitment and RCT adherence should be developed among this population.

show abstract

“…De manera cronológica, también se da crédito a otros autores que estudiaron el deterioro cognitivo e intentaron intervenirlo; tal es el caso de Garamendi, Delgado y Amaya (2010), Bae et al (2019), García-Sevilla, Fernández, Fuentes, López y Moreno (2014), Quintana Hernández y Miró Barrachina (2015), y Lastre Meza (2015), quienes ejecutaron investigaciones orientadas principalmente a programas de entrenamiento en personas mayores, sobre diversas funciones cognitivas, entre ellas la memoria, el lenguaje, funciones visoespaciales, razonamiento, lectura y escritura, además de potenciar la coherencia funcional y la integración personal, así como medir la efectividad de intervenciones multidimensionales que combinan actividades físicas, cognitivas y sociales, desarrolladas para promover la actividades básicas, instrumentales o avanzadas y, por ende, la función cognitiva en adultos mayores con deterioro cognitivo.…”

Section: Programa Efectos Del Programa | Revista Virtualunclassified

Efectos del programa para la estimulación y el mantenimiento cognitivo en demencias (Córtex) en una institución de Sincelejo (Colombia)

Meza

Puente

Sarmiento

2020

Rev.virtual univ. catol. norte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Se determinaron los efectos de la implementación del programa de estimulación y mantenimiento cognitivo en la demencia (CORTEX) en una población con deterioro cognitivo, a través de un estudio cuantitativo, explicativo, diseño cuasi-experimental, con prebruepa- postprueba en un grupo de estudio, en una muestra de diez (10) adultos mayores, seleccionados según criterios de inclusión y exclusión. En un primer momento, se aplicó la prueba Minimental y Moca como evaluación inicial; seguidamente, se ejecutó el programa de estimulación CORTEX durante cuatro meses, concluyendo con un postest con los mismos instrumentos. Los resultados demostraron que existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las funciones cognitivas de los pacientes cuando reciben entrenamiento cognitivo.

show abstract

The effect of a multicomponent intervention to promote community activity on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial

Cited by 60 publications

References 9 publications

Effect of Combined Physical and Cognitive Interventions on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Effect of Combined Physical and Cognitive Interventions on Executive Functions in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes

Recruitment and adherence of randomized controlled trials for mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Efectos del programa para la estimulación y el mantenimiento cognitivo en demencias (Córtex) en una institución de Sincelejo (Colombia)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About