Volume 1: Symposia, Parts a and B 2006
DOI: 10.1115/fedsm2006-98011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of a Modified Downcomer on the Hydrodynamics in an External Loop Airlift Reactor

Abstract: Gas holdup and superficial liquid velocity in the downcomer and riser are studied for an external loop airlift reactor with an area ratio of 1:16. Two downcomer configurations are investigated consisting of the downcomer open or closed to the atmosphere. Experiments for these two configurations are carried out over a range of superficial gas velocities from UG = 0.5 to 20 cm/s using three aeration plates with open area ratios of 0.62, 0.99 and 2.22%. These results are compared to a bubble column operated with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of U Lr is similar to that report in these works for EALRs with an A d /A r ratio smaller than 0.11; however, the way in which U Lr changes with increasing U G is much different due to the unique flow conditions observed in this EALR. Therefore, any attempt to predict U Lr for this reactor using the published correlations failed primarily due to the fact that there are changing liquid flow regimes in this reactor as noted by Jones and Heindel, (2006). U Lr in the EALR for the current investigation is a function of U G with a power-law dependence in the form:…”
Section: Liquid Velocity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The magnitude of U Lr is similar to that report in these works for EALRs with an A d /A r ratio smaller than 0.11; however, the way in which U Lr changes with increasing U G is much different due to the unique flow conditions observed in this EALR. Therefore, any attempt to predict U Lr for this reactor using the published correlations failed primarily due to the fact that there are changing liquid flow regimes in this reactor as noted by Jones and Heindel, (2006). U Lr in the EALR for the current investigation is a function of U G with a power-law dependence in the form:…”
Section: Liquid Velocity Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The gas flow rate is measured using a calibrated mass flow meter and the superficial gas velocity (U G ) is based on the cross-section of the riser. The gas holdup values in the riser (ε r ) and downcomer (ε d ) are calculated by the differential hydrostatic pressure method using two pressure transducers on the riser and an inclined U-tube manometer on the downcomer (Jones and Heindel, 2006).…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation