1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf02329579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of a desert climate on the lactation and on the fertility of the nursing rat

Abstract: Int. J. B i o m e t e o r . 1969, vol. 13, n u m b e r 1, pp. 61-68 The Effect of a Desert Climate on the Lactation and on the Fertility of the Nursing Rat b y M . M o r a g * , J . K a l i * * a n d M o n i c a F u r m a n * *) Negev I n s t i t u t e f o r A r i d Zone R e s e a r c h , B e e r -S h e v a , I s r a e l . **) Volcani I n s t i t u t e for A g r i c u l t u r a l R e s e a r c h , Rehovot, I s r a e l . Received 21 D e c e m b e r 1968

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggested that milk energy output was limited in the females lactating at the hot temperature potentially by their capacity to dissipate heat. Consistent with these data, it has been widely reported previously that exposure to high ambient temperature resulted in a considerable reduction of milk output in small rodents (Morag et al, 1969;Leon and Woodside, 1983;Jansen and Binard, 1991;Król and Speakman, 2003a,b;Wu et al, 2009;Simons et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2013;Wen et al, 2017) and large mammals (Cobble and Herman, 1951;Abdalla et al, 1993;Renaudeau et al, 2003). It has been previously observed that in the same strain of mouse the pup growth in the females raising small litters at hotter temperatures was similar to that in cooler conditions (Wen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This suggested that milk energy output was limited in the females lactating at the hot temperature potentially by their capacity to dissipate heat. Consistent with these data, it has been widely reported previously that exposure to high ambient temperature resulted in a considerable reduction of milk output in small rodents (Morag et al, 1969;Leon and Woodside, 1983;Jansen and Binard, 1991;Król and Speakman, 2003a,b;Wu et al, 2009;Simons et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2013;Wen et al, 2017) and large mammals (Cobble and Herman, 1951;Abdalla et al, 1993;Renaudeau et al, 2003). It has been previously observed that in the same strain of mouse the pup growth in the females raising small litters at hotter temperatures was similar to that in cooler conditions (Wen et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…These have included the 'central limitation hypothesis', which suggests that energy budgets are limited by the capacity of the alimentary tract to absorb and process food; the 'metabolic theory of ecology', which suggests that metabolic rates are limited by the geometry of the fractal supply network distributing absorbed resources to their sites of use; the 'peripheral limitation hypothesis', suggesting that total demand is a sum of the demands of individual tissues in the periphery, each working under unique physiological constraints; and the 'heat dissipation limitation (HDL) theory', which suggests that the constraining factor is the capacity to dissipate body heat and risk of hyperthermia (reviewed in Speakman and Król, 2005;Speakman and Król, 2011;Piersma and van Gils, 2010). Varying the ambient temperature experienced by animals during lactation has repeatedly shown that female animals modulate their intake at peak lactation in relation to the prevailing ambient temperature (Hammond et al, 1994;Jansen and Binard, 1991;Johnson and Speakman, 2001;Hammond and Kristan, 2000;Leon and Woodside, 1983;Morag et al, 1969;Rogowitz, 1998;Wu et al, 2009;Zhang and Wang, 2007). Such data are incompatible with, and hence disprove, the central limitation hypothesis and the metabolic theory of ecology, but are consistent with the two other ideas -the peripheral limitation hypothesis and the HDL theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In both species, relieving heat loss by either cooling the floor (sows) (Silva et al, 2006) or spraying with water (dairy cattle) (Igono et al, 1985) decreased body temperature and increased milk production. Exposure to high temperatures (close to 30°C) during lactation has also been shown to decrease pup growth in lab strains of rats (Rattus norvegicus) Heat dissipation in the common vole (Jansen and Binard, 1991;Leon and Woodside, 1983;Morag et al, 1969). By contrast, data that do not support the theory include the observation that cold exposure (10°C) did not increase milk production and retarded pup growth in cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) (Rogowitz, 1998), and shaving did not elevate milk production or pup growth in Swiss mice (Zhao and Cao, 2009;Zhao et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%