The Effect of a 10-MDP-Based Dentin Adhesive as Alternative for Bonding to Implant Abutment Materials

Carvalho, Paula Carolina Komori de; Almeida, Cláudia C M S; Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e; Tango, Rubens Nisie

doi:10.3390/ma15155449

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Considering the outstanding in vitro adhesive strengths showed by the CBC prototype, this composite could be an excellent starting point for a definitive luting cement able to strongly bond zirconia to dental substrates. The mSBS of the CBC prototype was indeed at the highest level ever reported in the recent literature [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], but it must be remembered that no aging treatments were applied to the specimens tested; thus, a drop in mSBS values is likely to happen once the material undergoes long-term water storage or thermocycling regimens. Further studies are necessary to confirm the residual bond strength of the CBC in simulated clinical conditions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Effect of Fluorographene Addition on Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of a New Core Build-Up Composite

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to develop a restorative material having such mechanical and adhesive properties that it can be used both as a reconstruction material and as a luting cement. The experimental core build-up composite (CBC) was derived from a self-adhesive cement by the modification of its chemical formula, requiring the use of dedicated dentin and ceramic primers. The adhesive properties to zirconia and dentin were analyzed with a micro-Shear Bond Strength test (mSBS). The mechanical properties were analyzed by a flexural strength test. The results were compared with those obtained for other commercially available cements and core build-up materials, both before and after addition of 2 wt.% fluorographene. The CBC obtained average values in the mSBS of 49.7 ± 4.74 MPa for zirconia and 32.2 ± 4.9 MPa for dentin, as well as values of 110.9 ± 9.3 MPa for flexural strength and 6170.8 ± 703.2 MPa for Young’s modulus. The addition of fluorographene, while increasing the Young’s modulus of the core build-up composite by 10%, did not improve the adhesive capabilities of the primers and cement on either zirconia or dentin. The CBC showed adhesive and mechanical properties adequate both for a restoration material and a luting cement. The addition of 2 wt.% fluorographene was shown to interfere with the polymerization reaction of the material, suggesting the need for further studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 87%

Effect of Fluorographene Addition on Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of a New Core Build-Up Composite

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It acts as a bridge by creating a siloxane network on the ceramic surface [ 25 , 31 ]. However, conventional silane primers are not sufficiently effective on metal oxides such as zirconia, so 10-MDP-containing silane with a high affinity for metal oxides was used in this study [ 32 ]. The 10-MDP molecule comprises a phosphoric-acid group on one end, a vinyl group on the other, and a spacer ester chain of ten carbons between them.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adhesive Performance of Resin Cement to Glass-Ceramic and Polymer-Based Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials after Applying Self-Etching Ceramic Primer or Different Surface Treatments

Turunç Oğuzman,

Şişmanoğlu

2023

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ensuring optimum bond strength during cementation is vital for restoration success, with the practicality of the process being crucial in clinical practice. This study analyzed the effect of a single-step self-etching ceramic primer (MEP) and various surface treatments on the microshear bond strength (µSBS) between resin cement and glass-ceramic or polymer-based ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Specimens were fabricated from leucite-based glass-ceramic (LEU), lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDC), resin nanoceramic (RNC), and polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) (n = 160). They were then classified based on the surface treatments (n = 10): control (no treatment); sandblasting with Al2O3 (AL); etching with hydrofluoric acid (HF); and MEP application. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the surface topography. µSBS was measured after cementation and thermocycling procedures. Failure modes were examined with a stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis involved two-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests with a significance level of 0.05. µSBS was significantly influenced by both surface treatment and CAD/CAM material type. The most enhanced µSBS values for each material, regarding the surface treatment, were: LEU and LDC, HF; RNC, AL; PICN, AL or HF. MEP significantly increased the µSBS values of CAD/CAM materials except RNC, yet it did not yield the highest µSBS values for any of them.

show abstract

“…Notably, each of these functional monomers can adhere to a specific material surface depending on the chemical structure. More specifically, MDP binds preferentially to zirconia and titanium [35], γ-MPTS binds to silica-based glass ceramics and silica-containing resin composites [36], 4-META is preferred for base metal alloys [37], and MTU-6 and VTD bind preferentially to noble metals [38]. However, these functional monomers are considered ineffective for PEEK bonding, as confirmed by the obtained experimental results, wherein the TBSs of the composite-based adhesive systems were close to zero (Figure 3); adhesion of the functional monomers to the PEEK surface would have led to increased TBSs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bond Strength of Sandblasted PEEK with Dental Methyl Methacrylate-Based Cement or Composite-Based Resin Cement

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) is commonly employed in dental prostheses owing to its excellent mechanical properties; however, it is limited by its low bond strength with dental resin cement. This study aimed to clarify the type of resin cement most suitable for bonding to PEEK: methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based resin cement or composite-based resin cement. For this purpose, two MMA-based resin cements (Super-Bond EX and MULTIBOND II) and five composite-based resin cements (Block HC Cem, RelyX Universal Resin Cement, G-CEM LinkForce, Panavia V5, and Multilink Automix) were used in combination with appropriate adhesive primers. A PEEK block (SHOFU PEEK) was initially cut, polished, and sandblasted with alumina. The sandblasted PEEK was then bonded to resin cement with adhesive primer according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting specimens were immersed in water at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by thermocycling. Subsequently, the tensile bond strengths (TBSs) of the specimens were measured; the TBSs of the composite-based resin cements after thermocycling were found to be zero (G-CEM LinkForce, Panavia V5, and Multilink Automix), 0.03 ± 0.04 (RelyX Universal Resin Cement), or 1.6 ± 2.7 (Block HC Cem), whereas those of Super-Bond and MULTIBOND were 11.9 ± 2.6 and 4.8 ± 2.3 MPa, respectively. The results demonstrated that MMA-based resin cements exhibited stronger bonding to PEEK than composite-based resin cements.

show abstract

The Effect of a 10-MDP-Based Dentin Adhesive as Alternative for Bonding to Implant Abutment Materials

Cited by 5 publications

References 34 publications

Effect of Fluorographene Addition on Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of a New Core Build-Up Composite

Effect of Fluorographene Addition on Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of a New Core Build-Up Composite

Adhesive Performance of Resin Cement to Glass-Ceramic and Polymer-Based Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials after Applying Self-Etching Ceramic Primer or Different Surface Treatments

Bond Strength of Sandblasted PEEK with Dental Methyl Methacrylate-Based Cement or Composite-Based Resin Cement

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About