2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20193.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of 12C +12C rate uncertainties on the evolution and nucleosynthesis of massive stars

Abstract: Over the last 40 years, the 12 C + 12 C fusion reaction has been the subject of considerable experimental efforts to constrain uncertainties at temperatures relevant for stellar nucleosynthesis. Recent studies have indicated that the reaction rate may be higher than that currently used in stellar models. In order to investigate the effect of an enhanced carbon-burning rate on massive star structure and nucleosynthesis, new stellar evolution models and their yields are presented exploring the impact of three di… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of varying the three uncertain reaction rates on massive stellar evolution, and nucleosynthesis in particular, have been previously explored by Weaver & Woosley (1993), Tur et al (2007), and West et al (2013) for 3α, and 12 C(α, γ ) 16 O and by Pignatari et al (2013);Bennett et al (2012) for 12 C+ 12 C, but none of these works explicitly focused on how these rates affect the structure of presupernova stars. We will not attempt a survey of all possibilities at the present time, but focus here on just the one rate for 12 C(α, γ ) 16 O. Compactness parameter as a function of main sequence mass for non-rotating, solar metallicity stars using variable rates for the 12 C(α, γ ) 16 O reaction rate.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Uncertain Nuclear Physics-12 C(α γ ) 16 Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of varying the three uncertain reaction rates on massive stellar evolution, and nucleosynthesis in particular, have been previously explored by Weaver & Woosley (1993), Tur et al (2007), and West et al (2013) for 3α, and 12 C(α, γ ) 16 O and by Pignatari et al (2013);Bennett et al (2012) for 12 C+ 12 C, but none of these works explicitly focused on how these rates affect the structure of presupernova stars. We will not attempt a survey of all possibilities at the present time, but focus here on just the one rate for 12 C(α, γ ) 16 O. Compactness parameter as a function of main sequence mass for non-rotating, solar metallicity stars using variable rates for the 12 C(α, γ ) 16 O reaction rate.…”
Section: Sensitivity To Uncertain Nuclear Physics-12 C(α γ ) 16 Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nuclear burning step is then followed by a mixing step that solves the diffusion equation using diffusion coefficients from the stellar evolution calculations. For more details of the NuGrid post-processing tool MPPNP and the reaction rate compilations that we use, we refer the reader to Bennett et al (2012) and Pignatari et al (2013b). We used the same key energy-producing reaction rates as are used in the MESA and GENEC stellar evolution calculations to ensure consistency where possible.…”
Section: Nucleosynthesis Post-processing Tool (Mppnp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties in these reaction rates, which are important during helium-and carbonburning, were shown by Tur et al to induce large changes in the remnant (proto-neutron star) masses, which propagate to the final (explosive) nucleosynthesis yields of massive stars. Uncertainties in the 12 C+ 12 C reaction rate also propagate through into uncertainties in weak s-process element production, primarily via the impact that enhancing or reducing the rate has on the stellar structure during carbon burning (Gasques et al 2007;Bennett et al 2012;Pignatari et al 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress in one field can be made with the help of the other. One may constrain nuclear physics uncertainties and determine their impact by using stellar evolution models as virtual nuclear physics laboratories (see e. g. [86,40]). At the same time, nucleosynthesis signatures can help constrain stellar evolution models (see e. g. [72]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%