2013
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The editorial process: Peer review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, peer review is an effective teaching/ learning approach for improving undergraduate Human Physiology majors' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding science and scientific writing. peer review; scientific writing; science literacy; student perceptions; human physiology PEER REVIEW is the process by which research findings are evaluated for quality, significance, and originality by experts in the field (3,5,29,41,44). It is vital to the practice and progress of science (2,3,26,40,51); however, it is not without well-documented flaws (3, 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, peer review is an effective teaching/ learning approach for improving undergraduate Human Physiology majors' knowledge, skills, and attitudes regarding science and scientific writing. peer review; scientific writing; science literacy; student perceptions; human physiology PEER REVIEW is the process by which research findings are evaluated for quality, significance, and originality by experts in the field (3,5,29,41,44). It is vital to the practice and progress of science (2,3,26,40,51); however, it is not without well-documented flaws (3, 6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PEER REVIEW is the process by which research findings are evaluated for quality, significance, and originality by experts in the field (3,5,29,41,44). It is vital to the practice and progress of science (2,3,26,40,51); however, it is not without well-documented flaws (3,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%