1996
DOI: 10.1177/030802269605901113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Editorial Board: Behind the Scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Every attempt was made to demystify what went on behind the scenes so that the Journal became more accessible to more people. Editorials, for example, were published about the role of the Editorial Board (Kelly and Drummond 1996) and what happened to an article after it had been submitted to the Journal (Curtin 1998). Readers were encouraged to write and share their expertise (Chard 1996).…”
Section: Jenny King 1996-1998mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every attempt was made to demystify what went on behind the scenes so that the Journal became more accessible to more people. Editorials, for example, were published about the role of the Editorial Board (Kelly and Drummond 1996) and what happened to an article after it had been submitted to the Journal (Curtin 1998). Readers were encouraged to write and share their expertise (Chard 1996).…”
Section: Jenny King 1996-1998mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many ways of doing this, such as through scientific research, clinical or community case studies, development of theoretical frameworks, developing and using new systems and equipment, clinical audit and student education. Yet frustration is clearly expressed both in Ms Minns' letter and in the reply from members of the Editorial Board (Kelly et al, 1996). Is the increasing use of jargon, theory, frames of reference and, worst of all, statistics only of interest to a select few readers?…”
Section: Expressing a Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%