The ecosystem approach and the global imperative on Toronto’s Central Waterfront

Abstract

As one of the 'last great waterfronts' to embrace what has become a near-ubiquitous post-fordist development model, the formerly industrial lands of Toronto's Central Waterfront are currently being reshaped to provide the kinds of spaces and places that facilitate new modes of capital accumulation. In order to understand how Toronto's waterfront has come to be mobilized to accommodate the imperatives of 21st-century global economic and spatial restructuring, this paper explores the area's recent planning history, reviewing the policies and politics of waterfront planning activities undertaken over the past twenty years. A new and novel 'ecosystem approach' to waterfront planning was adopted in Toronto in this period that allowed its proponents to resolve historical problems that had formerly impeded new forms of waterfront development. This paper demonstrates that, in so doing, the ecosystem approach -and its use by a succession of influential waterfront planning bodies and processes -set the stage for the Central Waterfront to become a key site for the elite pursuit of world city status in Toronto.

Creating an African Riviera: Revisiting the Impact of the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront Development in Cape Town

“…Among urban (re)development's many expressions, "the waterfront" must count as one of its most remarked upon articulations (Bunce and Desfor 2007;Hagerman 2007;Laidley 2007). The past four decades have witnessed many waterfront transformations from places where shipping and heavy industry dominated into spaces for residential, commercial, and leisure activities (Gospondini 2006;O'Callaghan and Linehan 2007.…”

Relational Comparisons: The Assembling of Cleveland's Waterfront Plan

“…These issues range from planning procedures (Dovey 2005;Cowan and Bunce, 2006) to sustainable design and political-ecological consequences (Bunce and Desfor, 2007;Laidley 2007;Bunce, 2009), from land reclamation (Norcliffe et al, 1996) to governance and management (Bassett et al, 2002;Desfor and Jørgenson, 2004), from leisure and gentrified residential developments (Wakefield, 2007) to struggles and resistance over future development (Lehrer and Laidley 2009;Scharenberg and Bader, 2009) It is our contention that these questions can begin to be addressed through working through two discrete but overlapping set of literatures that both in their own ways seek to grapple with how best to conceive of cities and the relationships between them. The first is on comparative urban studies.…”

Design by Competition and the Potential for Public Participation: Assessing an Urban Design Competition on Toronto’s Waterfront

“…Toronto's waterfront, as highlighted earlier, have also criticised the TWRC and preceding waterfront agencies for failing to engage a diversity of local people in the planning and redevelopment process (Laidley 2007;Lehrer and Laidley 2008). In a 2008 assessment of the TWRC's public consultation efforts, for example, Lehrer and Laidley argued that the corporation has engaged in "…the passive but specific exclusion of particular communities and groups" (796), especially those in poorer areas of the city.…”

“…It explores the challenges of introducing more participatory means of decision-making before turning to Toronto's waterfront, where regeneration efforts since the 1970s have been characterised by political infighting, overdevelopment and acute public dissatisfaction (Desfor et al 1989;Filion and Sanderson 2011;Laidley 2007). The paper illustrates the competition decisionmaking model and describes how it was structured around an iterative community participation process that was engineered to ignite local interest in the TWRC's waterfront redevelopment programme.…”