Conservation of Biological Resources 1998
DOI: 10.1002/9781444313598.ch11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economics of Wildlife Conservation Policy in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One alternative is to channel some of the revenue generated by wildlife-whether through tourism, trophy hunting, or other activities-back to local communities, and provide benefits to help offset costs not covered by compensation. The value of community remuneration for conservation appeared evident in Kenya: in areas where most of the revenue from ecotourism was retained by the tourism industry and the government, 29% to 65% of wildlife was lost between 1977 and 1994; in areas where revenues were shared among group ranches, wildlife held its own; and on private land where owners received all of the revenue, wildlife increased by 12% (38). However, recent assessments of wildlife trends in Kenya are less positive, revealing marked declines in wildlife numbers regardless of land-use type (39).…”
Section: Using Financial Mechanisms To Realign Global and Local Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One alternative is to channel some of the revenue generated by wildlife-whether through tourism, trophy hunting, or other activities-back to local communities, and provide benefits to help offset costs not covered by compensation. The value of community remuneration for conservation appeared evident in Kenya: in areas where most of the revenue from ecotourism was retained by the tourism industry and the government, 29% to 65% of wildlife was lost between 1977 and 1994; in areas where revenues were shared among group ranches, wildlife held its own; and on private land where owners received all of the revenue, wildlife increased by 12% (38). However, recent assessments of wildlife trends in Kenya are less positive, revealing marked declines in wildlife numbers regardless of land-use type (39).…”
Section: Using Financial Mechanisms To Realign Global and Local Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the local people do not see the need to protect wildlife especially the predators and crop raiders, which destroy their sources of livelihood subjecting them to poverty. According to Norton-Griffiths [48], wildlife raises the costs of livestock and agricultural production, the extent of property destruction and loss of human life, and grazing competition reduces net benefits of livestock. Because of conflicts, landowners are forced to take all kinds of defensive, some of which are detrimental to wildlife and the majority of land owners would like to see all wildlife eradicated and protected areas opened for development [49].…”
Section: Wildlife Consumption Awareness and Attitudes Of The Local Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid decline in wildlife has been noted in areas where benefits are not accrued to the local community [48]. Wildlife loss in non-tourism areas is higher than in tourism areas because the derived benefits support conservation activities and people are willing to conserve because of these benefits [54].…”
Section: Wildlife Consumption Awareness and Attitudes Of The Local Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to these, corruption and mismanagement joined the list from the early 1970s onwards (Mburu 2004;Leakey 2006;Gichohi 2011 6 ; Kaka 2011 6 ), and more recently, extreme weather events and climate change (KWS/TAWIRI 2010; Gichohi 2011 6 ). The economically uncompetitive nature of wildlife across most of Kenya's rangelands and the high costs of conservation have also been referred to as a cause for declines (Norton-Griffiths 1998;Shikwati 2003).…”
Section: Causes Of Wildlife Declinesmentioning
confidence: 99%