2000
DOI: 10.1057/9780230510432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economics of the Modern Construction Firm

Abstract: Contents ix An alternative approach to the 'problem' of the large firm Unequal exchange Economies of scale and of integration Transaction costs and business strategy in construction Subcontracting in construction -causes and consequences Economics of joint ventures Economics of subcontracts Concluding remarks Capacity at the level of an industry or sector The neo-classical versus the 'constant unit direct cost' model of supply response to demand Unit labour costs over the business cycle Measuring spare capacit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…personnel on site (Clarke 1992, 46-60;Gruneberg and Ive 2000). For the German contractors on our case study projects this remains the case; these still have large production departments.…”
Section: Cost and Production Divisions In British And German Firmsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…personnel on site (Clarke 1992, 46-60;Gruneberg and Ive 2000). For the German contractors on our case study projects this remains the case; these still have large production departments.…”
Section: Cost and Production Divisions In British And German Firmsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This invokes the attribution problem, which is necessary to assess the strategic benefits of differentiation and competitive advantage (cf. Gruneberg and Ive, 2000). Rust et al (2004) propose a broader conception to include return on quality, advertising, loyalty, and corporate citizenship.…”
Section: The Level Of the Project Businessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cova and Salle, 2011). On the output side, margins are of limited use in most project markets (Gruneberg and Ive, 2000), for example the percentage mark up on projects is low and sometimes negative for survival reasons during economic downturns (Skitmore and Smyth, 2007). Final accounts and gross margins are subject to long time lags.…”
Section: The Qualitative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the decision to 'buy' from market is largely based on purchasing situations where commercial exchange is uncomplicated and asset specificity is typically very low (Gruneberg and Ive, 2000).…”
Section: Building On a Foundation Of Organizational Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsidiaries of large construction conglomerates providing specialized products (for example, off-site production methods) or demonstrating a unique and expert service provision (for example, BIM) disclose an immediate economic advantage. Industry competitors would need to incorporate the full cost of specialist acquisition, complete with associated operational risks within the project tender price (Gruneberg and Ive, 2000).…”
Section: Supply Chain Management In Construction: Hierarchiesmentioning
confidence: 99%