The economics of the entrepreneur and the banker historical roots and contributions to the management of innovation

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to study the nature of the relationship between the entrepreneur and the banker, which is central to any analysis of business creation and innovation management. The author’s main purpose is to understand how this relationship has been studied by the pioneer economists of the entrepreneur and to highlight their contribution to the understanding of today’s reality. Design/methodology/approach To do so, the author proposes a sketch of an entrepreneur and banker economics based on the study of six economists (Cantillon, Smith, Bentham, Say, Schumpeter and Baumol) known for their works on entrepreneur theory. In their works, they explained how the (often difficult) relationship between the entrepreneur and the banker is built in a context of multi-uncertainty. They define the entrepreneur in different ways (a risk-taker, a prudent man, a projector, etc.), and put forward different behaviors facing uncertainty through social relations. The relationship between the entrepreneur and the banker can be read according to the grid of analysis of strong or weak ties (Granovetter, 1973). Findings This analysis demonstrates the importance of trust between the two protagonists. This contribution remains fundamental to study the behavior of financers and entrepreneurs today in the context of business eco-systems, clusters, science parks ‒ in other words, the main places of emergence of innovation. Research limitations/implications This research leads to the proposal of the main basis of an economics of the entrepreneur and the banker; it can be further developed with the addition of other contributions of historical economists. Practical implications This research shows the importance of thinking about the ways to build trust within the relation between entrepreneurs and their funders (bankers, venture capital, crowdfunding). Social implications The analysis of social ties (weak or strong) plays a major role in this relation. Originality/value The originality of the article is to come back to the works of pioneer economists and to show their contributions to the understanding of today’s reality.

Entrepreneurial crowdfunding backer motivations: a latent Dirichlet allocation approach

“…As Organisciak (2010) previously discovered in his investigation of crowdsourcing projects including Wikipedia, people are motivated to help and provide advice especially when they feel they know the answer. Boutillier (2019) identified the “wisdom of crowds” as an important source of benefits including knowledge for innovative projects. LDA topic #3 had the key words “know” and “update,” which offer strong support that backers of crowdfunding are also motivated to help and share knowledge they may have.…”

Financial leverage and corporate innovation in Chinese public-listed firms

“…Innovation output demands massive investments in research and development (R&D) and human capital, etc. The way this investment is financed has remained as an important topic of discussion among scholars in the field of corporate finance and corporate innovation (Hsu et al , 2013; Wang and Thornhill, 2010; Brown et al , 2009; Hall and Lerner, 2010; Kortum and Lerner, 2001; Boutillier, 2019). The most probable financing choices are debt and/or equity financing.…”

Crowdfunding and innovation: a bibliometric review and future research agenda

“…Moreover, building on previous theoretical underpinnings that raise awareness on the importance of crowdfunding as a source of financing that is democratizing the commercialization of innovation (Boutillier, 2019;Di Pietro et al, 2018;Macht and Weatherston, 2014;Mollick and Robb, 2016;Smith, 2015;Troise and Tani, 2020) in the EJIM 27,4 context of today's knowledge economy (Brem et al, 2019;Junge et al, 2021;Vrontis et al, 2020), a second research question has been developed to provide a bibliometric meta-analysis that clearly maps the relevant literature on different aspects of crowdfunding and innovation:…”