2005
DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2005.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economics of Minimally Invasive Total Knee Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Thus, despite excellent Knee Society scores, patients with TKA may experience serious functional limitations after the procedure. 11 We recognize that the lack of a thigh tourniquet in the present series contributed to earlier recovery from TKA. 3,20 The benefits of MIS surgery extend beyond patient satisfaction and improved early outcomes; the efficiency and economic rationale of MIS TKA have also been validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…8 Thus, despite excellent Knee Society scores, patients with TKA may experience serious functional limitations after the procedure. 11 We recognize that the lack of a thigh tourniquet in the present series contributed to earlier recovery from TKA. 3,20 The benefits of MIS surgery extend beyond patient satisfaction and improved early outcomes; the efficiency and economic rationale of MIS TKA have also been validated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…There is little reported in the literature regarding the cost benefits of MIS TKA. Coon et al [7] reported a charge reduction of $8600 per patient using MIS, but as noted, the sources of this reduction were not specified and simply may have been more efficient use of two operating suites. We therefore asked whether MIS TKAs are associated with decreased inpatient charges and hospital costs compared with traditional TKAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other factors, such as increased operative times, altered regimens of physical therapy, variations in the use of radiology services, and concerns that improper MIS component position may lead to early revision, may prevent the putative clinical benefits from translating into decreases in hospital costs or patient charges. Coon et al [7] were among the few authors to detail decreased costs associated with MIS TKA, but several methodologic limitations in their study limit drawing firm conclusions and call into question the magnitude of the reported cost savings. First, they reported a charge reduction of $8600 per patient using MIS; however, the sources of this reduction were not specified and simply may have been more efficient use of two operating suites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…March et al 25 Rasanen et al 32 Keating et al 30 Bozic et al 26 Honkanen et al 12 SooHoo et al 20 Slover et al 21 Coon et al 42 Gandjour et al 13 McBryde et al 36 Duwelius et al 6 Chang et al 23 Rorabeck et al 18 Clinkscales and Peterson 40 Rissanen et al 19 Lorenze et al 37 Givon et al 17 Gartsman et al 39 Kumar and Parker McKenzie et al 22 Briggs et al 31 Fielden et al 15 Meyer et al 8 38 Honkanen et al 24 Karuppiah et al 14 Papakonstantinou et al 35 Marinelli et al…”
Section: Disclosurementioning
confidence: 99%