1996
DOI: 10.2307/1243852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economics of a Public Fund for Environmental Amenities: A Study of CRP Contracts

Abstract: The problem of targeting CRP purchases to buy environmental amenities under productivity and environmental heterogeneity is considered. Gini coefficients and Lorenz curves are used to measure the effectiveness of spending under alternative targeting criteria. The environmental benefits considered are water erosion, wind erosion, surface water quality, and wildlife habitat. The three alternative targeting criteria examined include purchasing land according to (i) the benefit-to-cost ratio, (ii) the level of ben… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of agriculture, payments for ecosystem services are usually payments to landowners for leaving high-value conservation land uncultivated or payments that arise from an understanding that a working agricultural landscape, while not an undisturbed ecosystem, can perform a diverse array of services that go above and beyond producing food (Randall 2002, Sandhu et al 2008). These services include but are not limited to soil conservation and carbon sequestration through no-till agriculture or planting of hedgerows Diagana 2003, Knowler andBradshaw 2007), water conservation or quality improvement, and maintenance or conservation of biodiversity through practices such as active promotion of pollinators, intercropping to promote both plant and animal biodiversity, and establishing planting of native plant species (Babcock et al 1996, DiFalco 2012. Above and beyond the multifunctionality or ecosystem service benefits provided by these practices, they can also generate indirect benefits for farmer well-being through nonpecuniary externalities such as improved health through reduced exposure to pesticides (Huang et al 2003).…”
Section: Economic Factors That Support Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of agriculture, payments for ecosystem services are usually payments to landowners for leaving high-value conservation land uncultivated or payments that arise from an understanding that a working agricultural landscape, while not an undisturbed ecosystem, can perform a diverse array of services that go above and beyond producing food (Randall 2002, Sandhu et al 2008). These services include but are not limited to soil conservation and carbon sequestration through no-till agriculture or planting of hedgerows Diagana 2003, Knowler andBradshaw 2007), water conservation or quality improvement, and maintenance or conservation of biodiversity through practices such as active promotion of pollinators, intercropping to promote both plant and animal biodiversity, and establishing planting of native plant species (Babcock et al 1996, DiFalco 2012. Above and beyond the multifunctionality or ecosystem service benefits provided by these practices, they can also generate indirect benefits for farmer well-being through nonpecuniary externalities such as improved health through reduced exposure to pesticides (Huang et al 2003).…”
Section: Economic Factors That Support Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual determination of these scoring rules has been widely discussed, see e.g. [5,4]. The applied scoring has also been an issue in the wholesale market for electricity in California, where the choice of an unsuitable scoring rule had severe consequences, see [12] and [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research has implications for other targeting programs as well. Babcock et al (1996Babcock et al ( , 1997 consider targeting options under the USDA Conservation Reserve Program. However, in these analyses, there is no explicit provision of 3 information that allows the budget managers to improve the allocation of limited resources, thereby increasing overall environmental benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%