The economic value of flower tourism at the Namaqua National Park, South Africa

Abstract

The travel cost method was used to estimate the economic recreational value of flower viewing at the Namaqua National Park. Demographic, time, expenditure, preference and route information was collected from interviews with 160 SA nationals who visited the park in their own car. Visitors spent an average of $US108 on transportation and $US84 on accommodation in the region. A zonal travel cost model was developed which suggests that the economic recreational value of flower viewing at the park makes to the region is far larger than the annual net loss of $US50 000 which the park makes when only the expenses and revenue of the park are considered.

Who pays to view wildflowers in South Africa?

“…This view is supported by research showing that these tourists tend to be older, mostly in the 50-65 age group, and generally retired (James et al, 2007;Laurens, 2009;Loubser, Mouton, & Nel, 2001;Priskin, 2003). This profile tends to be similar to those who prefer bird watching (Jones & Buckley, 2004).…”

Analyzing the structure of tourism destination network based on digital footprints: taking Guilin, China as a case

“…Air transport connectivity generally has a greater influence than rail transport on dyadic tourist flows (Yang et al , 2017). (4) Tourist characteristics: Expenditure, time, demographic, route and preference have an effect on tourists (James et al , 2007). The expense, American tourists spent in Taiwan, is decided by their personal disposable income (Chen et al , 2015); hence tourists' income is a dominant factor regarding larger tourist flow (Santeramo and Morelli, 2016).…”