1983
DOI: 10.1016/0278-4254(83)90024-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic rationale for the nature and extent of corporate financial disclosure regulation: A critical assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
3

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The scoring was un-weighted, assigning a score of 1 when an index item was located in the website and a 0 when it was not located. Such a practice is quite popular in disclosure studies using an index to avoid arbitrariness (Inchausti, 1997) in the use of any weighted index and because use of such an un-weighted index will: (a) help avoid a user bias, and (b) the web-sites do not address the needs of a particular group of users but for all users (Cooke, 1989;Chow & Wong-Boren, 1987;Wang, O, & Clairborne, 2008) as a public good available to all users (Cooper & Keim, 1983). Furthermore, studies using both weighted and un-weighted indices (Chow & Wong-Boren, 1987) resulted into similar conclusions.…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scoring was un-weighted, assigning a score of 1 when an index item was located in the website and a 0 when it was not located. Such a practice is quite popular in disclosure studies using an index to avoid arbitrariness (Inchausti, 1997) in the use of any weighted index and because use of such an un-weighted index will: (a) help avoid a user bias, and (b) the web-sites do not address the needs of a particular group of users but for all users (Cooke, 1989;Chow & Wong-Boren, 1987;Wang, O, & Clairborne, 2008) as a public good available to all users (Cooper & Keim, 1983). Furthermore, studies using both weighted and un-weighted indices (Chow & Wong-Boren, 1987) resulted into similar conclusions.…”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent, and especially the convenience, of any accounting regulation system should be carefully determined by means of an empirical cost-benefit analysis, as authors generally point out (Demski & Feltham, 1976;Cooper & Keim, 1983;Scott, 2003;Wolk et al, 2012). In this regard, Watts and Zimmerman (1986, p. 178) accurately stated that, "(…) There is no clear justification for corporate disclosure regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the two approaches appear to be antithetical, they are actually interdependent, since they both envisage a regulatory activity based on public interest evaluations in terms of efficiency and equality, respectively (Cooper & Keim, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors have suggested that this problem is applicable to accounting information (see , for example, Gonedes et al (1976), Beaver (1977), Gonedes (1978), Foster (1980), and Cooper and Keim (1983)). Accounting regulation may be justified on the grounds that information asymmetry may lead to adverse selection, moral hazard and signalling behaviour.…”
Section: Market Failure Arguments For Accounting Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%