2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.asieco.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic impacts of China and India on sub-Saharan Africa: Trends and prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Horwitz (2012) Specifically relating to Chinese firms, common themes include trends in investments and trade, the political-economic debates about the benefits of Chinese FDI, debunking 'myths' of Chinese dominance, the role of Chinese soft power, how Africans view the AfricaChina phenomenon, and so forth (e.g. Fijalkowski, 2011;He, 2013;Hanusch, 2012;Jenkins and Edwards, 2006). Some authors suggest that Chinese engagement is driven by resourcedependence on energy and mineral security (Kurlantzick, 2006; while playing on Africa's 'historic suspicions' of western intentions (Taylor, 2006).…”
Section: Management Research In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Horwitz (2012) Specifically relating to Chinese firms, common themes include trends in investments and trade, the political-economic debates about the benefits of Chinese FDI, debunking 'myths' of Chinese dominance, the role of Chinese soft power, how Africans view the AfricaChina phenomenon, and so forth (e.g. Fijalkowski, 2011;He, 2013;Hanusch, 2012;Jenkins and Edwards, 2006). Some authors suggest that Chinese engagement is driven by resourcedependence on energy and mineral security (Kurlantzick, 2006; while playing on Africa's 'historic suspicions' of western intentions (Taylor, 2006).…”
Section: Management Research In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, inter alia: Malaysia, South Korea, Vietnam, and Thailand in East Asia and the Pacific (Khan, 2013;Lee, 2013;Warr, 2013;Jomo and Wee, 2013;Thoburn, 2013); the burgeoning Asian giants of India and China (Singh, 2013;Santos-Paulino, 2013;Yao, 2013;Asongu and Aminkeng, 2013); Latin America and the Caribbean with some emphasis on Costa Rica, Brazil, the 2 The interested reader can confirm this position by referring to, inter alia: Alves (2006), Gaye (2006), Schiere and Walkenhorst (2010) , Jenkins and Edwards, (2006), Moreira (2007), Brenton and Walkenhorst (2010), Guerroro and Manji (2008), Chemingui and Bchir (2010), Schiere (2010), Sanfilippo (2010), Wu and Cheng (2010), Kitissou (2007), Wei and Wang (2009), Lall et al (2005), Biggeri andSanfilippo (2009), Muneko andKoyi (2008), Wang and Zheng (2010), Ji (2010), Wang and Zheng (2012), Wei (2007), Duclos (2011), Mawdsley (2008, Zhu (2010), De Grauwe et al (2012, Klaplinsky and Messner (2008), Renard (2011), Lin andFarrell (2013), Drogendijk and Blomkvist (2013), Wei (2013), …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The question the model seeks to answer is, which of a set of business models are likely to receive domestic investment funds or FDI, and in what quantities? In contrast, most research on FDI focuses on other factors, including: FDI flows to countries (rather than projects) (Asiedu 2002, Sethi et al 2002, Akinkugbe 2003, Ahlquist 2006, Blonigen et al 2007, Busse and Hefeker 2007, Jinjarak 2007, Lim 2008, Dippenaar 2009); mode of entry (Kogut and Nath 1988, Hennart and Park 1993, Li and Filer 2007, Li and Rugman 2007, Nocke and Yeaple 2007, Asmussen et al 2009); the impact of FDI on host countries (Jenkins 2006, Adams, 2009, Chaudhuri 2010; and the decision making process within a particular firm (Dahlquist and Robertsson 2001, Moosa 2002, White and Fan 2006, Carlesi et al 2007, Dippenaar 2009, Klier 2009, Kinda 2010. A survey of the literature on FDI identified one paper assessing the potential of projects within a portfolio to attract foreign investment (Li and Sherali 2003); however, the methodology in that paper requires detailed knowledge of the projects and is unsuitable for a simulation model.…”
Section: Business Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%