The Economic Impact of Research and Competitiveness: The Satt Role in the Valorization, Acceleration and Transfer of Technology in France

Mejorar la transferencia de conocimiento y la colaboración entre ciencia y empresa en España

“…A largo plazo, este enfoque de «prueba y aprendizaje» redundaría en beneficio de todo el sistema, ya que permitiría ensayar diversos planteamientos y generar datos sobre sus repercusiones. Las 130 Actualmente, el nivel de competencia en el sistema de educación superior español es bajo, en especial si se compara con los sistemas anglosajones. Las universidades no tienen que competir por su financiación basal en función del rendimiento y apenas realizan actividades de captación de fondos (Berbegal-Mirabent, Gil-Doménech and de la Torre, 2021 [149]).…”

Improving knowledge transfer and collaboration between science and business in Spain

“…The proposals also need to clarify what is the role of R&D personnel that does not qualify formally as "researcher" or equivalent, as well as whether the IP law will be also modified. 130 It would also remain critical to assess, however, how much the behaviour of the different actors in the ecosystem can be really influenced by the measures contained in the law and what accompanying implementing actions (not strictly funding) need to be undertaken (e.g. changing practices, internal rules, codes of behaviour, etc.).…”

“…According to Arqué-Castells et al (2016), evidence from the inventors' survey in Portugal and Spain indicates that one third of respondents are incentivised by current royalty sharing arrangements, one third could be incentivised by higher royalty shares, and the remaining third is totally insensitive to royalty sharing. The proposed "one third" is a minimum mandatory share for institutions dependent on central government organisations, and a default when regional government controlled institutions do no set such limits 130. In several other countries, domestic IPR legislation does not include specific provisions for different types of domestic actors whose actions with regard to IPR are already included in actor-specific legislation.…”