1994
DOI: 10.1177/0011128794040004006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Economic Impact of Diverting Substance-Abusing Offenders into Treatment

Abstract: Recognizing the relationship between substance abuse and criminal behavior, the Wisconsin legislature in 1989 mandated the establishment of the Treatment Alternative Programs (TAP) modeled after the national Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) program. This study evaluates the economic impact of TAP by examining the benefits and costs and cost-effectiveness of diverting offenders from the criminal justice system into substance abuse treatment. The results suggest that the benefits of TAP outweigh its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blum, & Teufel-Stone, 2010;Pullmann et al, 2006) may reduce early and repeated arrests. Moreover, diversionary programs may be more cost-effective than incarceration for substance abusing offender (Mauser, Van Stelle, & Moberg, 1994). But first arrest already may be too late in a cumulative process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blum, & Teufel-Stone, 2010;Pullmann et al, 2006) may reduce early and repeated arrests. Moreover, diversionary programs may be more cost-effective than incarceration for substance abusing offender (Mauser, Van Stelle, & Moberg, 1994). But first arrest already may be too late in a cumulative process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 The study is conducted in three Wisconsin counties in 1990-91. There are 112 participants; 76 agreed to a baseline interview and only 25 completed the follow-up face-to face interview at approximately 20 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the prison and jail populations may be helped by treatment for drug dependence and abuse. Treatment in prison may provide an effective and possibly cost-effective intervention (49,63). Despite the apparent need for treatment, only 10%-20% of state and federal prisoners were receiving treatment while incarcerated (19).…”
Section: Treatment In Prisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few thorough CBAs of substance abuse treatment have been conducted based on a clinical trial of a standard treatment or an innovation (40). One study (63), however, analyzed three pilot projects designed to divert criminals into treatment instead of jail using a case management model. Focusing on criminal justice costs, productivity, and medical care costs, this study concluded that the benefits outweighed the costs.…”
Section: Cbamentioning
confidence: 99%