2019
DOI: 10.15199/48.2019.05.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The economic feasibility analysis of generated photovoltaic energy in the USTO campus

Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyze the economic impact of photovoltaic energy generation by a prospective campus microgrid to be installed at the University of Science and Technology (USTO). In this work, hourly solar irradiation and temperature data provided from the local weather office is used to study the distribution and duration of solar radiation over the campus. The generated solar photovoltaic energy is analyzed taking into account the economic aspects such as the photovoltaic system capital investme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimates are higher than those shown in this study. Similarly, the internal rate of return (IRR) of 5% indicated in the studies of (Bourahla et al 2019), of 10.36% by (Yaniktepe et al 2017), 7.33% by (Bermeo et al 2021), 12.2% by (Sanwogou et al 2019), 13% by (Windarta et al 2020) and 11% by (Vakili et al 2022) are well below the rate of return evaluated at 21.2% observed by the present study. It should be noted that almost all of the above projects showed a positive NPV; which indicates a good profitability of solar energy systems even if in the work of (Kristiawan et al 2018) the solar feasibility project carried out by the authors seemed unfeasible.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These estimates are higher than those shown in this study. Similarly, the internal rate of return (IRR) of 5% indicated in the studies of (Bourahla et al 2019), of 10.36% by (Yaniktepe et al 2017), 7.33% by (Bermeo et al 2021), 12.2% by (Sanwogou et al 2019), 13% by (Windarta et al 2020) and 11% by (Vakili et al 2022) are well below the rate of return evaluated at 21.2% observed by the present study. It should be noted that almost all of the above projects showed a positive NPV; which indicates a good profitability of solar energy systems even if in the work of (Kristiawan et al 2018) the solar feasibility project carried out by the authors seemed unfeasible.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The long-term saving achieved by the solar system studied by (Sanwogou et al 2019) in Togo, (Doudou 2016) in Niger and (Windarta et al 2020) in Indonesia indicates values that are much lower than those generated by scenario 6. As for the studies of Bourahla et al 2019) in Algeria, (Bermeo et al 2021) in Ecuador, (Hanen et al 2018) in Tunisia, (Doudou 2016) in Niger, (Yaniktepe et al 2017) and (Windarta et al 2020) in Indonesia, the authors observed dates that vary between 6 years and 21 years as the return on their investment. These estimates are higher than those shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation